Cited by 77Microbial infections and disease researchAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyLivestock Farming and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Market Forces on Bovine Respiratory Disease

Open access
Peel, Derrell S.·2020·Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice

Abstract

Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) is a persistent negative economic impact on beef and dairy industries and the inability to show any progress in controlling BRD is a source of increasing frustration among animal health professionals and the industry. The complex economic structure of the cattle industry leads to market failures in which cow-calf producers do not have sufficient economic incentive to invest in improved BRD control. This leads to higher costs for stocker and feedlot sectors. An industry-wide comprehensive effort is needed to coordinate and motivate enhanced BRD control focusing on producing healthy calves with less morbidity rather than treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Peel, 2003, Beef cattle growing and backgrounding programs, Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 19, 365, 10.1016/S0749-0720(03)00032-X · DOI
  2. Jenny, 1981, Management factors associated with calf mortality in South Carolina dairy herds, J Dairy Sci, 64, 2284, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82843-3 · DOI
  3. Wells, 1996, Factors associated with mortality to 21 days of life in dairy heifers in the United States, Prev Vet Med, 29, 9, 10.1016/S0167-5877(96)01061-6 · DOI
  4. Stehle, 2018, A profile of cattle feeding: beyond the averages, West Econ Forum, 16-2, 62
  5. Larsen, 2012, Step. Evidence-based effectiveness of vaccination against Mannheimia haemolitica, Pasteurella multocida and Histophilis somni in feedlot cattle for mitigating the incidence and effect of bovine respiratory disease complex, Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract, 28, 97, 10.1016/j.cvfa.2011.12.005 · DOI
  6. Williams, 2012, Determinants of price differentials in Oklahoma value-added feeder cattle auctions, J Ag & Res Econ, 37-1, 115
  7. Chirase, NK, LW Greene. Dietary zinc and manganese administered from the fetal stage onward affect immune response of transit stressed and virus infected offspring steer calves. Anim Sci Feed Tech 2001;93:217. · DOI
  8. Brooks, 2011, Economic effects of bovine respiratory disease on feedlot cattle during backgrounding and finishing phases, The Professional Animal Scientist, 27, 195, 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30474-5 · DOI
  9. Riley, 2019, Economic consequences of cow-calf disease mismanagement: bovine viral diarrhea virus, Appl Anim Sci, 35, 10.15232/aas.2019-01861 · DOI
  10. Summers AF, Funston RN. Fetal programming: implications for beef cattle production. Range Beef Cow Symposium. 2013. Available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/rangebeefcowsymp/319. Accessed April 16, 2020.
  11. Richeson, 2013, Association of hematologic variables and castration status at the time of arrival at a research facility with the risk of bovine respiratory disease in beef calves, J Am Vet Med Assoc, 243, 1035, 10.2460/javma.243.7.1035 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 77

Metadata

Authors
Peel, D. S.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Peel, Derrell S.
Venue
Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
497-508
ISSN
0749-0720 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027012831
Cited by
77
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Veterinary Clinics of North America Food Animal Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oklahoma State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Livestock Farming and Management
Keywords
bovine respiratory disease, market failure, cow-calf producers, calf health, economic incentives, beef and dairy cattle
MeSH terms
Red Meat, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Dairying, Female, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Marketing, Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Market Forces on Bovine Respiratory Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.008
The paper
Peel, D. S. (2020). The Effect of Market Forces on Bovine Respiratory Disease. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.008