Cited by 316Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Layered representations for learning and inferring office activity from multiple sensory channels

Oliver, Nuria, Garg, Ashutosh, Horvitz, Eric·2004·Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cviu.2004.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oliver, N., Garg, A., & Horvitz, E.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Oliver, Nuria
Venue
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-11
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
163-180
ISSN
1077-3142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2146136606
Cited by
316
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 23
FWCI
22.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Vision and Image Understanding (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
multi-sensor fusion, misclassification cost, real-time sensing, temporal granularity, human activity modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review