Interventional Thoracoscopy in Small Animals
Abstract
Thoracoscopy is a minimally invasive technique for viewing the internal structures of the thoracic cavity. The procedure uses a rigid telescope placed through a portal and positioned in the thoracic wall to examine the contents of the pleural cavity. Once the telescope is in place, either biopsy forceps or an assortment of surgical instruments can be introduced into the thoracic cavity through adjacent portals in the thoracic wall to perform various diagnostic or surgical procedures. The minimal invasiveness of the procedure, the rapid patient recovery, and the diagnostic accuracy make thoracoscopy an ideal technique compared with other more invasive procedures. This article discusses the use of interventional thoracoscopy (an emerging surgical technique) in veterinary surgery to perform pericardial window, subtotal pericardiectomy, or lung lobectomy to correct vascular ring anomalies, to ligate patent ductus arteriosus and the thoracic duct, and to aid in the treatment of pyothorax. Most procedures are performed under thoracoscopy, and some procedures can be thoracoscopically assisted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The method of examining the right lung is preferred over the left due to its higher reliability in detecting primary lung disease.
“The method of examining the right lung is preferred over the left due to its higher reliability in detecting primary lung disease [120,121].”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [121]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview
Kamel, M. S., Davidson, J. L., & Verma, M. S. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14040627 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“The method of examining the right lung is preferred over the left due to its higher reliability in detecting primary lung disease [120,121].”
Method
- Authors
- Monnet, E.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Monnet, Eric
- ORCID
- Monnet, Eric
- Venue
- Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 965-975
- ISSN
- 0195-5616 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008388223
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
- Keywords
- thoracic surgery, small animals, pericardial window, pulmonary lobectomy, vascular ring, ductus ligation, thoracic duct ligation, empyema, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, pleural cavity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cat Diseases, Cats, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Heart Diseases, Lung Diseases, Thoracoscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review