Cited by 39interferon and immune responsesChromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

Cut, copy, move, delete: The study of human interferon genes reveal multiple mechanisms underlying their evolution in amniotes

Krause, Christopher D., Pestka, Sidney·2015·Cytokine

Abstract

Interferons (IFNs) are rapidly evolving cytokines released when viral infections are detected in cells. Previous research suggests that genes encoding IFNs and their receptors duplicated extensively throughout vertebrate evolution. We present molecular genetic evidence that supports the use of nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) to expand select IFN genes during amniote evolution. The duplication of long regions of genome (encompassing at least one functional IFN gene) followed by the insertion of this genome fragment near its parent's location, is commonly observed in many amniote genomes. Duplicates inserted away from duplication hotspots are not as frequently perturbed with new duplicates, and tend to survive long periods of evolution, sometimes becoming new IFN subtypes. Although most duplicates are inserted parallel to and near the original sequence, the insertion of the Kelch-like 9 gene within the Type I IFN locus of placental mammals promoted antiparallel insertion of gene duplicates between the Kelch-like 9 and IFN-ε loci. Genetic exchange between highly similar Type I gene duplicates as well as between Type III IFN gene duplicates homogenized their diversification. Oddly, Type III IFN genes migrated long distances throughout the genome more frequently than did Type I IFN genes. The inter-chromosomal movement of Type I IFN genes in amniotes correlated with complete intron loss in their gene structure, and repeatedly occurred with occasional Type III IFN genes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.07.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krause, C. D., & Pestka, S.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Krause, Christopher D.
Venue
Cytokine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
76
Issue
2
Pages
480-495
ISSN
1043-4666 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W942832854
Cited by
39
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cytokine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › interferon and immune responses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
interferon genes, gene duplication, non-allelic homologous recombination, amniote evolution, type I interferon, interferon lambda, interferon epsilon, intron loss, gene relocation, interferon subtypes, placental mammals, antiviral defense
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Humans, Interferons, Phylogeny, Placenta, Pregnancy, Primates, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Duplication, Homologous Recombination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review