The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pairings for cryptographers
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the Size of Pairing-Based Non-interactive Arguments
Groth, J. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_11 · Cited by 1,271
Predicate Encryption Supporting Disjunctions, Polynomial Equations, and Inner Products
Katz, J., Sahai, A., & Waters, B. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_9 · Cited by 1,081
Efficient Non-interactive Proof Systems for Bilinear Groups
Groth, J., & Sahai, A. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_24 · Cited by 1,076
Identity-based key agreement protocols from pairings
Chen, L., Cheng, Z., & Smart, N. P. (2007) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-006-0011-9 · Cited by 395
Self-citationStructure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements
Abe, M., Fuchsbauer, G., Groth, J., Haralambiev, K., & Ohkubo, M. (2010) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_12 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Galbraith, S. D., Paterson, K. G., & Smart, N. P.
- Venue
- Discrete Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 3113-3121
- ISSN
- 0166-218X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026892462
- Cited by
- 794
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 70.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pairings for cryptographers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dam.2007.12.010
- The paper
- Galbraith, S. D., Paterson, K. G., & Smart, N. P. (2008). Pairings for cryptographers. Discrete Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2007.12.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
