Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 567

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 410 of the 410 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead

Open access
Bull, Philip, Akrami, Yashar, Adamek, Julian, Baker, Tessa, Bellini, Emilio, Beltrán Jiménez, Jose, Bentivegna, Eloisa, Camera, Stefano, Clesse, Sébastien, Davis, Jonathan H., Di Dio, Enea, Enander, Jonas, Heavens, Alan, Heisenberg, Lavinia, Hu, Bin, Llinares, Claudio, Maartens, Roy, Mörtsell, Edvard, Nadathur, Seshadri, Noller, Johannes, Pasechnik, Roman, Pawlowski, Marcel S., Pereira, Thiago S., Quartin, Miguel, Ricciardone, Angelo, Riemer-Sørensen, Signe, Rinaldi, Massimiliano, Sakstein, Jeremy, Saltas, Ippocratis D., Salzano, Vincenzo, Sawicki, Ignacy, Solomon, Adam R., Spolyar, Douglas, Starkman, Glenn D., Steer, Danièle, Tereno, Ismael, Verde, Licia, Villaescusa-Navarro, Francisco, von Strauss, Mikael, Winther, Hans A.·2016·Physics of the Dark Universe
DOI 10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite its continued observational successes, there is a persistent (and growing) interest in extending cosmology beyond the standard model, ΛCDM. This is motivated by a range of apparently serious theoretical issues, involving such questions as the cosmological constant problem, the particle nature of dark matter, the validity of general relativity on large scales, the existence of anomalies in the CMB and on small scales, and the predictivity and testability of the inflationary paradigm. In this paper, we summarize the current status of ΛCDM as a physical theory, and review investigations into possible alternatives along a number of different lines, with a particular focus on highlighting the most promising directions. While the fundamental problems are proving reluctant to yield, the study of alternative cosmologies has led to considerable progress, with much more to come if hopes about forthcoming high-precision observations and new theoretical ideas are fulfilled.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001

Cites

410 of 410 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 410 references

Cited by

See all 567

Metadata

Authors
Bull, P., Akrami, Y., Adamek, J., Baker, T., Bellini, E., Beltrán Jiménez, J., Bentivegna, E., Camera, S., Clesse, S., Davis, J. H., Di Dio, E., Enander, J., Heavens, A., Heisenberg, L., Hu, B., Llinares, C., Maartens, R., Mörtsell, E., Nadathur, S., Noller, J., Pasechnik, R., Pawlowski, M. S., Pereira, T. S., Quartin, M., Ricciardone, A., Riemer-Sørensen, S., Rinaldi, M., Sakstein, J., Saltas, I. D., Salzano, V., Sawicki, I., Solomon, A. R., Spolyar, D., Starkman, G. D., Steer, D., Tereno, I., Verde, L., Villaescusa-Navarro, F., von Strauss, M., & Winther, H. A.
Venue
Physics of the Dark Universe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
12
Pages
56-99
ISSN
2212-6864 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001
OpenAlex
W2949154581
Cited by
567
References
410
FWCI
25.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001
The paper
Bull, P., Akrami, Y., Adamek, J., Baker, T., Bellini, E., Beltrán Jiménez, J., Bentivegna, E., Camera, S., Clesse, S., Davis, J. H., Di Dio, E., Enander, J., Heavens, A., Heisenberg, L., Hu, B., Llinares, C., Maartens, R., Mörtsell, E., Nadathur, S., . . . Winther, H. A. (2016). BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead. Physics of the Dark Universe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2016.02.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.