Cited by 77Machine Learning and Data ClassificationAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Entropy-based redundancy analysis and information screening

Open access
Li, Yang, Yang, Jiachen, Wen, Jiabao·2023·Digital Communications and Networks

Abstract

The ongoing data explosion introduced unprecedented challenges to the information security of communication networks. As images are one of the most commonly used information transmission carriers; therefore, their data redundancy analysis and screening are of great significance. However, most of the current research focus on the algorithm improvement of commonly used image datasets. Thus, we should consider an important question: Is there data redundancy in the open datasets? Considering the factors of model structures and data distribution to ensure the generalization, we conducted extensive experiments to compare the average accuracy based on few random data to the baseline accuracy based on all data. The results show serious data redundancy in the open datasets from different domains. For instance, with the aid of deep model, only 20% data can achieve more than 90% of the baseline accuracy. Further, we proposed a novel entropy-based information screening method, which outperforms the random sampling under many experimental conditions. In particular, considering 20% of data, for the shallow model, the improvement is approximately 10%, and for the deep model, the ratio to the baseline accuracy increases to greater than 95%. Moreover, this work can also serve as a new way of learning from a few valuable samples, compressing the size of existing datasets and guiding the construction of high-quality datasets in the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcan.2021.12.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The highly-discussed dimension target class balance pays tribute to the technical requirements of ML.

    “Finally, the highly-discussed dimension target class balance pays tribute to the technical requirements of ML140,141,144,150,159.”

    From The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [150]

    In §2 (Materials; page unavailable), the paper says it made both classification datasets balanced, with equal numbers of images per class. This supports the relevance of target-class balance to its ML experiments, but the paper does not state that balance is a general technical requirement of ML. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The most prominent data quality dimension in the DL papers is amount of data, which is empirically shown to benefit performance, albeit in a saturating manner.

    “The most prominent dimension is amount of data123–126,129,146–159,183–189 which is empirically shown to benefit performance, albeit in a saturating manner.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. J. Yang, J. Wen, B. Jiang, et al., Blockchain-based sharing and tamper-proof framework of big data networking, IEEE Network 34 (4) (2020) 62-67.
  2. J. Yang, M. Xi, B. Jiang, et al., FADN: fully connected attitude detection network based on industrial video, IEEE.Trans.Ind. Inf. 17 (3) (2020) 2011-2020.
  3. J. Wen, J. Yang, B. Jiang, et al., Big data driven marine environment information forecasting: a time series prediction network, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 29 (1) (2020) 4-18.
  4. K. Gai, J. Guo, L. Zhu, et al., Blockchain meets cloud computing: a survey, Commun. Surv. Tutorials, IEEE,Commun. Surv. Tutorials 22 (3) (2020) 2009-2030.
  5. L. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Wang, et al., Machine learning based real-time visible fatigue crack growth detection, Digit. Commun.Network (2021). In press.
  6. J. Yang, Y. Zhao, J. Liu, et al., No reference quality assessment for screen content images using stacked autoencoders in pictorial and textual regions, IEEE Trans.Cybern. (2020).
  7. S. Minaee, Y.Y. Boykov, F. Porikli, et al., Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Survey, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2021.
  8. W. Jiang, K. Huang, J. Geng, et al., Multi-scale Metric Learning for Few-Shot Learning, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2020.
  9. J. Lu, S. Jin, J. Liang, et al., Robust few-shot learning for user-provided data, IEEE.Trans. Neural Network.Learn Syst 32 (4) (2020) 1433-1447.
  10. J. Zhang, Y. Huang, R. Pu, et al., Monitoring plant diseases and pests through remote sensing technology: a review, Comput. Electron. Agric. 165 (2019) 104943.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Yang, J., & Wen, J.
Affiliations
  • Shihezi University (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Jiachen
Venue
Digital Communications and Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1061-1069
ISSN
2352-8648 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200113878
Cited by
77
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 35
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Communications and Networks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (32 101 612, 61 871 283)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
data redundancy, dataset compression, information security, communication networks, few-shot learning, random sampling comparison, model generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review