Sex-dependent variations in the immune status of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio laevis (Crustacea, Isopoda) as a response to environmental perturbation: a case of microplastic exposure in soil
Open accessAbstract
Sex-dependent variation in immune responses in arthropods is well established in cases of microbial infection or parasitism but remains less explored under environmental stress. In this study we examined whether the sex of terrestrial isopods Porcellio laevis affects their immune response to soil microplastic (MP) exposure. Animals were exposed for 14 days to polypropylene MPs at 0.05%, 0.5%, and 5% (w/w soil), and immune parameters, including total haemocyte count, haemocyte viability, phenoloxidase (PO)-like activity, and haemolymph protein content, were assessed alongside survival and growth. Overall, MP exposure induced sex-dependent alterations in immune status, with males and females exhibiting distinct response patterns: females exhibited reduced haemocyte-related parameters at specific MP concentrations, whereas males showed higher haemolymph protein levels and increased growth at the highest concentration. PO-like activity was consistently higher in females. Although not all responses were statistically significant, effect size analysis indicated medium to large sex-related differences across multiple endpoints. Most of the effects were related to the dose of MP, with changes detectable already at lower concentrations. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating sex as a biological factor in ecotoxicological studies and support the use of immune markers as sensitive indicators of sublethal environmental stress.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53
- Authors
- Dolar, A., Kajin, M., & Jemec Kokalj, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Ljubljana (SI)
- Corresponding author
- Dolar, Andraž
- Venue
- Developmental & Comparative Immunology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-09
- Volume
- 182
- Pages
- 105705
- ISSN
- 0145-305X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7197028988
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental & Comparative Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- dCOBISS.SI Digital Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency (J1-50014, P1-0184)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- Porcellio laevis, terrestrial isopods, sex differences, immune response, microplastics, polypropylene, soil contamination, hemocyte count, phenoloxidase activity, hemolymph proteins, immunological markers, sublethal stress, ecotoxicology, arthropod immunity
- MeSH terms
- Microplastics, Animals, Environmental Exposure, Female, Hemocytes, Hemolymph, Male, Sex Factors, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Monophenol Monooxygenase, Isopoda
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review