Cited by 77Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Altered error-related brain activity in youth with major depression

Open access
Ladouceur, Cecile D., Slifka, John S., Dahl, Ronald E., Birmaher, Boris, Axelson, David A., Ryan, Neal D.·2012·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Depression is associated with impairments in cognitive control including action monitoring processes, which involve the detection and processing of erroneous responses in order to adjust behavior. Although numerous studies have reported altered error-related brain activity in depressed adults, relatively little is known about age-related changes in error-related brain activity in depressed youth. This study focuses on the error-related negativity (ERN), a negative deflection in the event-related potential (ERP) that is maximal approximately 50ms following errors. High-density ERPs were examined following responses on a flanker task in 24 youth diagnosed with MDD and 14 low-risk healthy controls (HC). Results indicate that compared to HC, MDD youth had significantly smaller ERN amplitudes and did not exhibit the normative increases in ERN amplitudes as a function of age. Also, ERN amplitudes were similar in depressed youth with and without comorbid anxiety. These results suggest that depressed youth exhibit different age-related changes in brain activity associated with action monitoring processes. Findings are discussed in terms of existing work on the neural correlates of action monitoring and depression and the need for longitudinal research studies investigating the development of neural systems underlying action monitoring in youth diagnosed with and at risk for depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.01.005

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using the Flanker task do not observe a significant difference in spatial selective attention performance between unmedicated major depressive disorder patients and healthy controls.

    “More often than not, studies investigating spatial selective attention by using the Flanker task (identifying the direction of an arrow flanked by distracting arrows) do not observe a significant difference in performance between unmedicated MDD patients and healthy controls21,22.”

    From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 104 · Cited by 77

Authors
Ladouceur, C. D., Slifka, J. S., Dahl, R. E., Birmaher, B., Axelson, D. A., & Ryan, N. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Ladouceur, Cecile D.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
351-362
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014033233
Cited by
77
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, adolescent depression, error-related negativity, action monitoring, cognitive control, age-related changes, flanker task, anxiety comorbidity, event-related potentials, neural correlates of depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Diseases, Child, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review