Cited by 16Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The hemodynamic response in children with Simplex Autism

Open access
Feczko, Eric, Miezin, Francis M., Constantino, John N., Schlaggar, Bradley L., Petersen, Steven E., Pruett, John R.·2012·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Background Numerous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of the brain-bases of autism have demonstrated altered cortical responses in subjects with autism, relative to typical subjects, during a variety of tasks. These differences may reflect altered neuronal responses or altered hemodynamic response. This study searches for evidence of hemodynamic response differences by using a simple visual stimulus and elementary motor actions, which should elicit similar neuronal responses in patients and controls.Methods We acquired fMRI data from two groups of 16 children, a typical group and a group with Simplex Autism, during a simple visuomotor paradigm previously used to assess this question in other cross-group comparisons. A general linear model estimated the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal time course, and repeated-measures analysis of variance tested for potential cross-group differences in the BOLD signal.Results The hemodynamic response in Simplex Autism is similar to that found in typical children. Although the sample size was small for a secondary analysis, medication appeared to have no effect on the hemodynamic response within the Simplex Autism group.Conclusions When fMRI studies show BOLD response differences between autistic and typical subjects, these results likely reflect between-group differences in neural activity and not an altered hemodynamic response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 16

Authors
Feczko, E., Miezin, F. M., Constantino, J. N., Schlaggar, B. L., Petersen, S. E., & Pruett, J. R.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
396-408
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044437189
Cited by
16
References
32
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (“Brain Circuitry in Simplex Autism,” Steven Petersen – PI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, hemodynamic response, BOLD signal, children, visuomotor task, neuronal activity, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Child, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Activity, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review