Cited by 84Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Atypical lateralization of ERP response to native and non-native speech in infants at risk for autism spectrum disorder

Open access
Seery, Anne M., Vogel-Farley, Vanessa, Tager-Flusberg, Helen, Nelson, Charles A.·2013·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Language impairment is common in autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and is often accompanied by atypical neural lateralization. However, it is unclear when in development language impairment or atypical lateralization first emerges. To address these questions, we recorded event-related-potentials (ERPs) to native and non-native speech contrasts longitudinally in infants at risk for ASD (HRA) over the first year of life to determine whether atypical lateralization is present as an endophenotype early in development and whether these infants show delay in a very basic precursor of language acquisition: phonemic perceptual narrowing. ERP response for the HRA group to a non-native speech contrast revealed a trajectory of perceptual narrowing similar to a group of low-risk controls (LRC), suggesting that phonemic perceptual narrowing does not appear to be delayed in these high-risk infants. In contrast there were significant group differences in the development of lateralized ERP response to speech: between 6 and 12 months the LRC group displayed a lateralized response to the speech sounds, while the HRA group failed to display this pattern. We suggest the possibility that atypical lateralization to speech may be an ASD endophenotype over the first year of life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Infants at high risk for ASD, regardless of whether they ultimately meet diagnostic criteria for ASD, have different developmental trajectories within the first year of life compared to low-risk infants.

    “There is now accumulating evidence from electroencephalographic (EEG) studies suggesting that infants at high risk for ASD, regardless of whether they ultimately meet diagnostic criteria for ASD, have different developmental trajectories within the first year of life compared to low-risk infants [10–20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 84

Authors
Seery, A. M., Vogel-Farley, V., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Nelson, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Seery, Anne M.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
5
Pages
10-24
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034453622
Cited by
84
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIDCD (R21 DC 08637, R01 DC 10290)
  • Simons Foundation (137186)
  • Autism Speaks Pilot Grants Program
  • Autism Speaks Dennis Weatherstone Predoctoral Fellowship Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, event-related potentials, speech perception, endophenotypes, language development, native vs non-native speech, longitudinal development
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Cross-Sectional Studies, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Functional Laterality, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Risk Factors, Speech, Endophenotypes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review