Cited by 147Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents’ and adults’ neural response to reward

Open access
Smith, Ashley R., Steinberg, Laurence, Strang, Nicole, Chein, Jason·2015·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Prior research suggests that increased adolescent risk-taking in the presence of peers may be linked to the influence of peers on the valuation and processing of rewards during decision-making. The current study explores this idea by examining how peer observation impacts the processing of rewards when such processing is isolated from other facets of risky decision-making (e.g. risk-perception and preference, inhibitory processing, etc.). In an fMRI paradigm, a sample of adolescents (ages 14-19) and adults (ages 25-35) completed a modified High/Low Card Guessing Task that included rewarded and un-rewarded trials. Social context was manipulated by having participants complete the task both alone and while being observed by two, same-age, same-sex peers. Results indicated an interaction of age and social context on the activation of reward circuitry during the receipt of reward; when observed by peers adolescents exhibited greater ventral striatal activation than adults, but no age-related differences were evinced when the task was completed alone. These findings suggest that, during adolescence, peers influence recruitment of reward-related regions even when they are engaged outside of the context of risk-taking. Implications for engagement in prosocial, as well as risky, behaviors during adolescence are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2014.08.010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence of a similarly aged peer may increase risky decision making as well as ventral striatum and vlPFC activation in adolescents.

    “In contrast to the role of parents, however, the presence of a similarly aged peer may increase risky decision making as well as ventral striatum and vlPFC activation in adolescents [51,52].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 147

Authors
Smith, A. R., Steinberg, L., Strang, N., & Chein, J.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Chein, Jason
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
11
Pages
75-82
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010870298
Cited by
147
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA022546-01)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA020006-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
peer influence, adolescents, reward processing, ventral striatum, social environment, risky decision making, age differences, prosocial behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aging, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Peer Group, Reward, Risk-Taking, Young Adult, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review