Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents’ and adults’ neural response to reward
Open accessAbstract
Prior research suggests that increased adolescent risk-taking in the presence of peers may be linked to the influence of peers on the valuation and processing of rewards during decision-making. The current study explores this idea by examining how peer observation impacts the processing of rewards when such processing is isolated from other facets of risky decision-making (e.g. risk-perception and preference, inhibitory processing, etc.). In an fMRI paradigm, a sample of adolescents (ages 14-19) and adults (ages 25-35) completed a modified High/Low Card Guessing Task that included rewarded and un-rewarded trials. Social context was manipulated by having participants complete the task both alone and while being observed by two, same-age, same-sex peers. Results indicated an interaction of age and social context on the activation of reward circuitry during the receipt of reward; when observed by peers adolescents exhibited greater ventral striatal activation than adults, but no age-related differences were evinced when the task was completed alone. These findings suggest that, during adolescence, peers influence recruitment of reward-related regions even when they are engaged outside of the context of risk-taking. Implications for engagement in prosocial, as well as risky, behaviors during adolescence are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of a similarly aged peer may increase risky decision making as well as ventral striatum and vlPFC activation in adolescents.
“In contrast to the role of parents, however, the presence of a similarly aged peer may increase risky decision making as well as ventral striatum and vlPFC activation in adolescents [51,52].”
From The neuroscience of emotion regulation development: Implications for education (2016) · cites this paper as [52]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 147
- Authors
- Smith, A. R., Steinberg, L., Strang, N., & Chein, J.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Chein, Jason
- Venue
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 75-82
- ISSN
- 1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4324356
- OpenAlex
- W2010870298
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA022546-01)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA020006-01)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- peer influence, adolescents, reward processing, ventral striatum, social environment, risky decision making, age differences, prosocial behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aging, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Peer Group, Reward, Risk-Taking, Young Adult, Ventral Striatum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review