Cited by 247Protein Degradation and InhibitorsChromatin Remodeling and CancerHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research

Clinical trials for BET inhibitors run ahead of the science

Open access
Andrieu, Guillaume, Belkina, Anna C., Denis, Gerald V.·2016·Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Abstract

Several cancer clinical trials for small molecule inhibitors of BET bromodomain proteins have been initiated. There is enthusiasm for the anti-proliferative effect of inhibiting BRD4, one of the targets of these inhibitors, which is thought to cooperate with MYC, a long-desired target for cancer therapeutics. However, no current inhibitor is selective for BRD4 among the three somatic BET proteins, which include BRD2 and BRD3; their respective functions are partially overlapping and none are functionally redundant with BRD4. Each BET protein controls distinct transcriptional pathways that are important for functions beyond cancer cell proliferation, including insulin production, cytokine gene transcription, T cell differentiation, adipogenesis and most seriously, active repression of dangerous latent viruses like HIV. BET inhibitors have been shown to reactivate HIV in human cells. Failure to appreciate that at concentrations used, no available BET inhibitor is member-selective, or to develop a sound biological basis to understand the diverse functions of BET proteins before undertaking for these clinical trials is reckless and likely to lead to adverse events. More mechanistic information from new basic science studies should enable proper focus on the most relevant cancers and define the expected side effect profiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ddtec.2016.06.004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 247

Authors
Andrieu, G., Belkina, A. C., & Denis, G. V.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Denis, Gerald V.
Venue
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
19
Pages
45-50
ISSN
1740-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2503456027
Cited by
247
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA182898)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Keywords
BET inhibitors, BRD4, BRD2, BRD3, c-Myc, HIV reactivation, small molecule inhibitors, cancer clinical trials, adverse events, transcriptional regulation, drug selectivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Inflammation, Macrophages, Neoplasms, Nuclear Proteins, Transcription Factors, Adipocytes, Insulin-Secreting Cells, Th17 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review