Cited by 106Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Cereblon modulators: Low molecular weight inducers of protein degradation

Chamberlain, Philip P., Cathers, Brian E.·2019·Drug Discovery Today: Technologies

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation has become an exciting new paradigm in drug discovery with the potential to target new protein families for therapeutic intervention. In 2010, Hiroshi Handa and colleagues discovered that the drug thalidomide binds to the protein cereblon, a component of the CRL4CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase. In contrast to the heterobifunctional small molecule degraders reported in the literature, thalidomide is of very low molecular weight (∼258Da) with molecular properties (solubility, metabolic stability, permeability etc) that readily support pharmaceutical dosing. It was subsequently shown that thalidomide and the analogues lenalidomide and pomalidomide are able to degrade the transcription factors Ikaros and Aiolos. CK1α and GSPT1 were subsequently identified as substrates for specific ligands, indicating that this molecular class could be tuned for selective protein degradation. Structural studies showed that the thalidomide analogues bind to a shallow hydrophobic pocket on the surface of cereblon, and scaffold a protein-protein interaction with target proteins. Target proteins do not need any affinity for the cereblon modulators, and as such undruggable, or even unligandable, proteins can be targeted for degradation. A similar mechanism of action was subsequently identified for the clinical molecule indisulam, indicating that low molecular weight degraders are not unique to cereblon. The groundbreaking work on cereblon represents a case study for the discovery and characterization of low molecular weight protein degraders for other ligases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ddtec.2019.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRBN appears to be emerging as a preferred E3 ligase for the first wave of TPD therapeutics in clinical trials.

    “CRBN appears to be emerging as a preferred E3 ligase for the first wave of TPD therapeutics in clinical trials.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [72]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 106

Authors
Chamberlain, P. P., & Cathers, B. E.
Corresponding author
Chamberlain, Philip P.
Venue
Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
31
Pages
29-34
ISSN
1740-6749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921711362
Cited by
106
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
cereblon, targeted protein degradation, thalidomide analogues, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, Ikaros, Aiolos, CK1α, GSPT1, indisulam, undruggable proteins, protein-protein interaction, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Humans, Molecular Weight, Peptide Hydrolases, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review