Cereblon modulators: Low molecular weight inducers of protein degradation
Abstract
Targeted protein degradation has become an exciting new paradigm in drug discovery with the potential to target new protein families for therapeutic intervention. In 2010, Hiroshi Handa and colleagues discovered that the drug thalidomide binds to the protein cereblon, a component of the CRL4CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase. In contrast to the heterobifunctional small molecule degraders reported in the literature, thalidomide is of very low molecular weight (∼258Da) with molecular properties (solubility, metabolic stability, permeability etc) that readily support pharmaceutical dosing. It was subsequently shown that thalidomide and the analogues lenalidomide and pomalidomide are able to degrade the transcription factors Ikaros and Aiolos. CK1α and GSPT1 were subsequently identified as substrates for specific ligands, indicating that this molecular class could be tuned for selective protein degradation. Structural studies showed that the thalidomide analogues bind to a shallow hydrophobic pocket on the surface of cereblon, and scaffold a protein-protein interaction with target proteins. Target proteins do not need any affinity for the cereblon modulators, and as such undruggable, or even unligandable, proteins can be targeted for degradation. A similar mechanism of action was subsequently identified for the clinical molecule indisulam, indicating that low molecular weight degraders are not unique to cereblon. The groundbreaking work on cereblon represents a case study for the discovery and characterization of low molecular weight protein degraders for other ligases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
CRBN appears to be emerging as a preferred E3 ligase for the first wave of TPD therapeutics in clinical trials.
“CRBN appears to be emerging as a preferred E3 ligase for the first wave of TPD therapeutics in clinical trials.”
From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [72]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Chamberlain, P. P., & Cathers, B. E.
- Corresponding author
- Chamberlain, Philip P.
- Venue
- Drug Discovery Today: Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- 29-34
- ISSN
- 1740-6749 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921711362
- Semantic Scholar
- 8fd0b2b6a27fe8abc98cff806753a01673eb742d
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug Discovery Today Technologies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- cereblon, targeted protein degradation, thalidomide analogues, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, Ikaros, Aiolos, CK1α, GSPT1, indisulam, undruggable proteins, protein-protein interaction, drug discovery
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Molecular Weight, Peptide Hydrolases, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review