The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decolorization of dye solutions by a membrane bioreactor (MBR) using white-rot fungi
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A membrane-separated fungi reactor couples the excellent degradation capability of white-rot fungi with the inherent advantages of a membrane bioreactor.
“An innovative approach noticeable in contemporary literatures involves membrane (submerged 78 / sidestream 62,102 ) separated fungi reactor which couples the excellent degradation capability (due to non-specific extracellular oxidative enzymes) of white-rot fungi with the inherent advantages of membrane bioreactor.”
From Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater (2007) · cites this paper as [102]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Fu, 2001, Bioresource Technol., 79, 251, 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00028-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Abadulla, 2000, J. Textile Res., 70, 409, 10.1177/004051750007000506 · DOI
- Lee, 2002, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 12, 909
- Jeon, 2002, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 12, 972
- Kapdan, 2000, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 26, 381, 10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00168-4 · DOI
- Criquet, 1999, Soil Biol. Biochem., 31, 1239, 10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00038-3 · DOI
- Hofrichter, 1985, J. Biotechnol., 242, 329
- Ha, 2001, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 55, 704, 10.1007/s002530100653 · DOI
- Palma, 1999, Wat. Sci. Tech., 40, 131, 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00618-6 · DOI
- Edwards, 1999, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 24, 209, 10.1016/S0141-0229(98)00110-0 · DOI
- Livingston, 1994, J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol., 60, 117, 10.1002/jctb.280600202 · DOI
- Archibald, 1992, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 3110, 10.1128/AEM.58.9.3110-3116.1992 · DOI
- Abadulla, 2000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 3357, 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3357-3362.2000 · DOI · Paper page
- Borchert, 2001, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 75, 313, 10.1002/bit.10026 · DOI
- Young, 1997, Water Res., 31, 1187, 10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00380-6 · DOI
- Zhang, 1999, Water Res., 33, 919, 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00288-7 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent advances on the removal of dyes from wastewater using various adsorbents: a critical review
Dutta, S., Gupta, B., Srivastava, S. K., & Gupta, A. K. (2021) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d1ma00354b · Cited by 1,296
Hybrid Treatment Systems for Dye Wastewater
Hai, F. I., Yamamoto, K., & Fukushi, K. (2007) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380601174723 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, T.-H., Lee, Y., Yang, J., Lee, B., Park, C., & Kim, S.
- Venue
- Desalination
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 168
- Pages
- 287-293
- ISSN
- 0011-9164
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review