CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 81Arsenic contamination and mitigationWater Treatment and DisinfectionCoagulation and Flocculation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Arsenic removal from groundwaters containing iron, ammonium, manganese and phosphate: A case study from a treatment unit in northern Greece

Katsoyiannis, Ioannis A., Zikoudi, Antonia, Hug, Stephan J.·2008·Desalination
DOI 10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Schwarzenbach, 2006, The challenge of micropollutants in aquatic systems, Science, 313, 1072, 10.1126/science.1127291 · DOI
  2. Nordstrom, 2002, Worldwide occurrence of arsenic in groundwater, Science, 246, 2143, 10.1126/science.1072375 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Korte, 1991, A review of As(III) in groundwater, Critical Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 21, 1, 10.1080/10643389109388408 · DOI
  4. Katsoyiannis, 2004, Biological treatment of Mn(II) and Fe(II) containing groundwater: kinetic consideration and product characterisation, Water Res., 38, 1922, 10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.014 · DOI
  5. Gouzinis, 1998, Removal of Mn and simultaneous removal of NH3, Fe and Mn from potable water using a trickling filter, Water Res., 32, 2442, 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00471-5 · DOI
  6. Katsoyiannis, 2006, Comparative evaluation of conventional and alternative methods for the removal of arsenic from contaminated groundwaters, Rev. Environ. Health, 21, 25, 10.1515/REVEH.2006.21.1.25 · DOI
  7. Leupin, 2005, Arsenic removal from Bangladesh tube well water with filter columns containing zero valent iron filling ans sand, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8032, 10.1021/es050205d · DOI
  8. Cullen, 1989, Arsenic speciation in the environment, Chem. Rev., 89, 713, 10.1021/cr00094a002 · DOI · Paper page
  9. I.A. Katsoyiannis, S.J. Hug, A. Ammann, A. Zikoudi and X. Hatziliontos, Arsenic speciation and uranium concentrations in drinking water supply ground water wells in Northern Greece: correlation with redox indicative parameters and implications for groundwater treatment, Sci. Total Environ., in press.
  10. Tallman, 1980, Redox stability of inorganic As(III) and As(V) in aqueous solutions, Anal. Chem., 52, 196, 10.1021/ac50051a047 · DOI
  11. Roberts, 2004, Arsenic removal with iron(II) and iron(III) in waters with high silicate and phosphate concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 307, 10.1021/es0343205 · DOI
  12. Zouboulis, 2005, Recent advantages in the bioremediation of arsenic contaminated groundwaters, Environ. Int., 31, 213, 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.018 · DOI
  13. Katsoyiannis, 2006, Use of iron and manganese oxidizing bacteria for the combined removal of iron, manganese and arsenic from contaminated groundwaters, Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 41, 117, 10.2166/wqrj.2006.014 · DOI
  14. Kim, 2000, Oxidation of arsenite in groundwater using ozone and oxygen, Sci. Total Environ., 247, 71, 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00470-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Huang, 2003, Iron-catalyzed oxidation of arsenic(III) by oxygen and by hydrogen peroxide: pH-dependent formation of oxidants in the Fenton reaction, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 2734, 10.1021/es026208x · DOI
  16. Katsoyiannis, 2004, Kindetics of bacterial As(III) oxidation and subsequent As(V) sorption onto biogenic manganese oxides during groundwater treatment, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 486, 10.1021/ie030525a · DOI · Paper page
  17. Zouboulis, 2002, Removal of arsenates from contaminated water by coagulation-direct filtration, Sep. Sci. Technol., 37, 2859, 10.1081/SS-120005470 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Katsoyiannis, I. A., Zikoudi, A., & Hug, S. J.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Katsoyiannis, Ioannis A.
  • Hug, Stephan J.
ORCID
Venue
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
224
Issue
1-3
Pages
330-339
ISSN
0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.014
OpenAlex
W2011960474
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Desalination (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
Keywords
arsenic removal, groundwater treatment, biological oxidation, aeration, coagulation, phosphate removal, manganese removal, ammonium removal, nitrification, arsenite oxidation, manganese oxide, iron oxide, municipal water supply

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review