A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminum sulfate
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The TiO2/UV system has inefficient removal of arsenic because of incomplete oxidation of AsIII to AsV when a trace of TiO2 is present.
“The TiO2/UV system has an inefficient removal of As because of incomplete oxidation of AsIII to AsV when a trace of TiO2 is present [156].”
From Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater: A Review of Sources, Prevalence, Health Risks, and Strategies for Mitigation (2014) · cites this paper as [156]
Cites
Violante, A., Gaudio, S. D., Pigna, M., Ricciardella, M., & Banerjee, D. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es070382+ · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shankar, S., Shanker, U., & Shikha (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/304524 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
“Their study asserted that the aluminum species regulate the removal of As and thus As removal efficiency can be improved by adjusting the pH. Bilici Baskan and Pala [161] optimized the effects ofmajor operational parameters such as the initial AsV concentration, the coagulant dose, and pH and achieved 91% removal of A…”
BackgroundRemoval of arsenic from drinking water using modified natural zeolite
Bilici Baskan, M., & Pala, A. (2011) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.015 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bilici Baskan, M., & Pala, A.
- Venue
- Desalination
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 254
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 42-48
- ISSN
- 0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966467315
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Desalination (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Water Treatment and Disinfection
- Keywords
- arsenic removal, drinking water treatment, coagulation, aluminum sulfate, co-precipitation, arsenate, pH effect, coagulant dosage, flocculation, cationic polyelectrolytes, coagulant aid, response surface methodology, Box-Behnken design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
