Cited by 220Membrane-based Ion Separation TechniquesExtraction and Separation ProcessesMembrane Separation Technologies

A review on lithium recovery using electrochemical capturing systems

Open access
Zavahir, Sifani, Elmakki, Tasneem, Gulied, Mona, Ahmad, Zubair, Al-Sulaiti, Leena, Shon, Ho Kyong, Chen, Yuan, Park, Hyunwoong +2 more·2021·Desalination

Abstract

Resource recovery from natural reserves is appealing and Li extraction from different brines is in the forefront. Li extraction by membranes is reviewed in the literature much more than electrochemical processes. However, a very recent review thoroughly discussed Li recovery by electrochemically switchable ion exchange (ESIX). This paper reviews Li recovery by both charge transfer processes, namely electrodialysis (ED), and electro-sorption processes, namely capacitive deionization (CDI). It also reviews ESIX with a focus on performance matrices and includes comments on the technology readiness of each separation technique. These processes exhibit promising perspectives on the separation and recovery of Li both selectively and non-selectively from simulated brine solutions and Li salt solutions. Readers are provided with guidelines to choose between the processes, depending on the applied voltage, current density, specific energy consumption and purity of recovered Li. Most electrochemical lithium capturing systems (ELiCSs) have been tested at the lab scale. Therefore, future research should be directed toward pilot-scale development and parameter optimization. Furthermore, we urge the ELiCSs research community to report information in a standard form that allows meaningful comparisons and insights into the systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114883

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The AC counter electrode demonstrated a high Li recovery of 14.4 mg/g for a 25 min cycle, so it is recommended for all ESIX systems.

    “The AC counter electrode demonstrated a high Li recovery of 14.4 mg/g for a 25 min cycle, so it is recommended for all ESIX systems (Zhao et al., 2020d; Zavahir et al., 2021).”
  • An array of smaller electrodes with higher surface areas arranged into working and counter electrode pairs can be employed for recovery instead of a large, singular electrode.

    “An array of smaller electrodes with higher surface areas arranged into working and counter electrode pairs can be employed for recovery instead of a large, singular electrode (Joo et al., 2020; Zavahir et al., 2021).”
  • The specific energy consumption for SED recovery from Li+ is more efficient for salt lake brines than seawater due to their higher ionic strength and mass ratios.

    “Finally, the SEC for SED recovery from Li + is more ef fi cient for salt lake brines than seawater due to their higher ionic strength and mass ratios (Zavahir et al., 2021).”
  • ESIX batch operation is less efficient than other continuous mode technologies, such as electrodialysis.

    “Furthermore, this batch operation is less ef fi cient than other continuous mode technologies, such as electrodialysis (Zavahir et al., 2021).”
  • The solution enrichment process at the commercial level can be expected to exceed 1,000 cycles.

    “Therefore, the solution enrichment process at the commercial level can be expected to exceed 1,000 cycles (Zavahir et al., 2021).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 151 · Cited by 220

Authors
Zavahir, S., Elmakki, T., Gulied, M., Ahmad, Z., Al-Sulaiti, L., Shon, H. K., Chen, Y., Park, H., Batchelor, B., & Han, D. S.
Affiliations
  • Qatar University (QA)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Kyungpook National University (KR)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Han, Dong Suk
Venue
Desalination
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
500
Pages
114883
ISSN
0011-9164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109965900
Cited by
220
References
151
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 17
FWCI
6.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Desalination (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Qatar National Research Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
Keywords
lithium recovery, electrodialysis, capacitive deionization, lithium brines, lithium separation, specific energy consumption, technology readiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review