Autophagosome Biogenesis in Primary Neurons Follows an Ordered and Spatially Regulated Pathway
Open accessAbstract
Autophagy is an essential degradative pathway in neurons, yet little is known about mechanisms driving autophagy in highly polarized cells. Here, we use dual-color live-cell imaging to investigate the neuron-specific mechanisms of constitutive autophagosome biogenesis in primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and hippocampal cultures. Under basal conditions, autophagosomes are continuously generated in the axon tip. There is an ordered assembly of proteins recruited with stereotypical kinetics onto the developing autophagosome. Plasma- or mitochondrial-derived membranes were not incorporated into nascent autophagosomes in the distal axon. Rather, autophagosomes are generated at double FYVE-containing protein 1 (DFCP1)-positive subdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), distinct from ER exit sites. Biogenesis events are enriched distally; autophagosomes form infrequently in dendrites, the soma, or midaxon, consistent with a compartmentalized pathway for constitutive autophagy in primary neurons. Distal biogenesis may facilitate degradation of damaged mitochondria and long-lived cytoplasmic proteins reaching the axon tip via slow axonal transport.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autophagy initiation typically begins outside of the soma, in the distal axon tip.
“Autophagy initiation typically begins outside of the soma, in the distal axon tip [370,372,373].”
From Autophagy and ALS: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications (2022) · cites this paper as [373]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 372
- Authors
- Maday, S., & Holzbaur, E. L. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holzbaur, Erika L.F.
- Venue
- Developmental Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-85
- ISSN
- 1534-5807 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4109719
- OpenAlex
- W1971898834
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 17.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K99NS082619, R37NS060698, NS060698, R01NS060698)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- autophagosome formation, neurons, dorsal root ganglion neurons, hippocampal neurons, axonal transport, mitochondrial degradation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Autophagy, Axons, Biological Transport, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Dendritic Cells, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Hippocampus, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Mitochondria, Neurons, Phagosomes, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review