Cited by 372Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCellular transport and secretionUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Autophagosome Biogenesis in Primary Neurons Follows an Ordered and Spatially Regulated Pathway

Open access
Maday, Sandra, Holzbaur, Erika L.F.·2014·Developmental Cell

Abstract

Autophagy is an essential degradative pathway in neurons, yet little is known about mechanisms driving autophagy in highly polarized cells. Here, we use dual-color live-cell imaging to investigate the neuron-specific mechanisms of constitutive autophagosome biogenesis in primary dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and hippocampal cultures. Under basal conditions, autophagosomes are continuously generated in the axon tip. There is an ordered assembly of proteins recruited with stereotypical kinetics onto the developing autophagosome. Plasma- or mitochondrial-derived membranes were not incorporated into nascent autophagosomes in the distal axon. Rather, autophagosomes are generated at double FYVE-containing protein 1 (DFCP1)-positive subdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), distinct from ER exit sites. Biogenesis events are enriched distally; autophagosomes form infrequently in dendrites, the soma, or midaxon, consistent with a compartmentalized pathway for constitutive autophagy in primary neurons. Distal biogenesis may facilitate degradation of damaged mitochondria and long-lived cytoplasmic proteins reaching the axon tip via slow axonal transport.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 372

Authors
Maday, S., & Holzbaur, E. L. F.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Holzbaur, Erika L.F.
Venue
Developmental Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
71-85
ISSN
1534-5807 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971898834
Cited by
372
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
17.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K99NS082619, R37NS060698, NS060698, R01NS060698)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
autophagosome formation, neurons, dorsal root ganglion neurons, hippocampal neurons, axonal transport, mitochondrial degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Axons, Biological Transport, Cell Membrane, Cells, Cultured, Dendritic Cells, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Hippocampus, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Transgenic, Mitochondria, Neurons, Phagosomes, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review