Cost of workplace accommodations for individuals with disabilities: with or without personal assistance services
Abstract
Background This study compared the expense associated with use of personal assistance services (PAS) for individuals with disabilities to the expense incurred by individuals with disabilities who did not use PAS. The intent of this investigation was to assess the disability accommodation costs and benefits of PAS and non-PAS cases.Methods The study uses 1,182 follow-up telephone surveys and 24 telephone interviews of employers who had previously contacted the Job Accommodation Network (JAN) to discuss disability-related accommodations for an employee or potential employee that were conducted from January 2004 through December 2006. The survey included 69 employers who had considered PAS. The surveys were conducted by the University of Iowa's Law, Health Policy, and Disability Center, which contacted employers who had previously contacted JAN for consultation on workplace accommodations. The interviews were conducted by the International Center for Disability Information at West Virginia University.Results Key findings point to the costs associated with PAS cases and with cases not involving PAS accommodations. As reported by the employers, the median "one-time cost" of accommodations (not $0) for non-PAS cases was $500. The median "one-time cost" of accommodations (not $0) for PAS cases was $1,850. When $0 cost of accommodations on PAS cases was factored in with "one-time cost" of accommodations for PAS cases, the median cost was $0. For non-PAS cases of accommodations, when $0 cost of accommodations was considered, the outcome was a median cost of $0. The annual cost for PAS accommodations was a median cost of $8,000 in comparison to $2,000 for non-PAS. The median dollar amount estimates of direct benefits were $1,600 for PAS accommodations, similar to $1,500 for non-PAS. The most frequently mentioned benefits from PAS accommodations were (a) increased productivity, (b) increased diversity, (c) retention of a valued employee, (d) improved interactions with co-workers, (e) increased overall company morale, and (f) increased overall company productivity.Conclusions The findings heighten awareness of the cost and benefits aspects associated with PAS for people with disabilities. Many non-PAS accommodations cost nothing to the employer (e.g., changing the work schedule, moving the individual to another location). When dollar cost was involved, the costs for PAS accommodations were more than three times greater than non-PAS accommodations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Having people with developmental disabilities in the workforce facilitated social inclusion and workplace well-being.
“Owen et al. [75] noted that having people with developmental disabilities in the workforce facilitated the enhancement of social inclusion and workplace well-being.”
From A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
Secondary outcomes for people with disabilities included improved quality of life, enhanced self-confidence, a source of earnings or income, an expanded social network, and a sense of community.
“Secondary outcomes included benefits for people with disabilities themselves such as improved quality of life [53], enhanced self-confidence [18,74,75,77], a source of earnings or income [78,79], an expanded social network [79], and a sense of a community [79].”
From A Systematic Review of the Benefits of Hiring People with Disabilities (2018) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Solovieva, T. I., Walls, R. T., Hendricks, D. J., & Dowler, D. L.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Solovieva, Tatiana I.
- Venue
- Disability and Health Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 196-205
- ISSN
- 1876-7583 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6574
- OpenAlex
- W2168999260
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Disability and health journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Education › Healthcare innovation and challenges
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
- Keywords
- workplace accommodations, personal assistance services, employment of people with disabilities, employer costs, cost-benefit analysis, labor productivity, employee retention
- MeSH terms
- Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Expenditures, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Iowa, Personal Health Services, West Virginia, Employment, Supported, Workplace, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review