Cited by 47Disability Education and EmploymentHealthcare innovation and challengesOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Cost of workplace accommodations for individuals with disabilities: with or without personal assistance services

Solovieva, Tatiana I., Walls, Richard T., Hendricks, Deborah J., Dowler, Denetta L.·2009·Disability and Health Journal

Abstract

Background This study compared the expense associated with use of personal assistance services (PAS) for individuals with disabilities to the expense incurred by individuals with disabilities who did not use PAS. The intent of this investigation was to assess the disability accommodation costs and benefits of PAS and non-PAS cases.Methods The study uses 1,182 follow-up telephone surveys and 24 telephone interviews of employers who had previously contacted the Job Accommodation Network (JAN) to discuss disability-related accommodations for an employee or potential employee that were conducted from January 2004 through December 2006. The survey included 69 employers who had considered PAS. The surveys were conducted by the University of Iowa's Law, Health Policy, and Disability Center, which contacted employers who had previously contacted JAN for consultation on workplace accommodations. The interviews were conducted by the International Center for Disability Information at West Virginia University.Results Key findings point to the costs associated with PAS cases and with cases not involving PAS accommodations. As reported by the employers, the median "one-time cost" of accommodations (not $0) for non-PAS cases was $500. The median "one-time cost" of accommodations (not $0) for PAS cases was $1,850. When $0 cost of accommodations on PAS cases was factored in with "one-time cost" of accommodations for PAS cases, the median cost was $0. For non-PAS cases of accommodations, when $0 cost of accommodations was considered, the outcome was a median cost of $0. The annual cost for PAS accommodations was a median cost of $8,000 in comparison to $2,000 for non-PAS. The median dollar amount estimates of direct benefits were $1,600 for PAS accommodations, similar to $1,500 for non-PAS. The most frequently mentioned benefits from PAS accommodations were (a) increased productivity, (b) increased diversity, (c) retention of a valued employee, (d) improved interactions with co-workers, (e) increased overall company morale, and (f) increased overall company productivity.Conclusions The findings heighten awareness of the cost and benefits aspects associated with PAS for people with disabilities. Many non-PAS accommodations cost nothing to the employer (e.g., changing the work schedule, moving the individual to another location). When dollar cost was involved, the costs for PAS accommodations were more than three times greater than non-PAS accommodations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dhjo.2009.04.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having people with developmental disabilities in the workforce facilitated social inclusion and workplace well-being.

    “Owen et al. [75] noted that having people with developmental disabilities in the workforce facilitated the enhancement of social inclusion and workplace well-being.”
  • Secondary outcomes for people with disabilities included improved quality of life, enhanced self-confidence, a source of earnings or income, an expanded social network, and a sense of community.

    “Secondary outcomes included benefits for people with disabilities themselves such as improved quality of life [53], enhanced self-confidence [18,74,75,77], a source of earnings or income [78,79], an expanded social network [79], and a sense of a community [79].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 47

Authors
Solovieva, T. I., Walls, R. T., Hendricks, D. J., & Dowler, D. L.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Solovieva, Tatiana I.
Venue
Disability and Health Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
196-205
ISSN
  • 1876-7583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-6574
OpenAlex
W2168999260
Cited by
47
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and health journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Education › Healthcare innovation and challenges
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
workplace accommodations, personal assistance services, employment of people with disabilities, employer costs, cost-benefit analysis, labor productivity, employee retention
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Expenditures, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Iowa, Personal Health Services, West Virginia, Employment, Supported, Workplace, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review