Factors related to early intervention Part C enrollment: A systematic review
Abstract
Background The first few years of life are critical for the healthy growth and development of every child. Enrolling children with disabilities or at risk of developmental delay into early intervention services is essential to successfully meet their physical, cognitive, communication, socio-emotional and adaptive needs. However, many children throughout in the United States who are eligible for public services, including early intervention services, are not accessing them. Research has yet to fully describe low enrollment rates and variability in enrollment into early intervention services. Objective The objective of this review was to systematically examine current literature on enrollment of children less than three years of age into early intervention (Part C) services through the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Methods A systematic review of relevant articles in MEDLINE, ERIC, and Google Scholar databases were conducted in March 2015. Two authors independently reviewed abstracts according to established inclusion criteria. Eligible articles were then read, confirmed, and themes were extracted. Results Ten articles met established inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The five themes that emerged included policies for children at risk of a developmental delay, funding allocated to programs, eligibility definitions, referral into Part C programs, and structure of the state administrative system. Conclusions Future research should identify best practices for policy that would benefit children gaining access to services early on. It is critical that we thoughtfully address policy decisions affecting enrollment of children into early intervention programs during the next reauthorization of IDEA.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reasons for non-enrollment in Part C EI extend beyond family and child-related factors to include state-level policies, funding, referral systems, and administrative system structures.
“According to a recent systematic review, these reasons extend beyond family and child-related factors to include state-level policies, funding, referral systems, and administrative system structures (Twardzik et al., 2017).”
From Parenting Stress, Child Social Functioning, and Part C Early Intervention in Predominantly Low-Income Families of Children With or at High Risk for Developmental Delay From Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups (2023) · cites this paper as Twardzik et al., 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 21 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Twardzik, E., Cotto-Negrón, C., & MacDonald, M.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Twardzik, Erica
- Venue
- Disability and Health Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 467-474
- ISSN
- 1876-7583 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-6574
- OpenAlex
- W2582235544
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Disability and health journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- early intervention, Part C, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, children with disabilities, developmental delay, access to services, referral, program funding, IDEA reauthorization, children under 3 years
- MeSH terms
- Child, Developmental Disabilities, Eligibility Determination, Humans, Referral and Consultation, Early Intervention, Educational, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children, Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review