Cited by 69Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

Implantable insulin pumps. A position statement about their clinical use

Renard, E., Schaepelynck-Bélicar, P.·2007·Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Aim To review clinical use of implantable insulin pumps and to suggest indications for this therapy. Methods The EVADIAC group performed a review of published reports on implantable insulin pumps for the last 15 years and analyzed its own centralized database. From this update, a position statement on indications of this therapy is drawn. Results Published papers mostly report safety and effectiveness data from observational cumulated experiences of 15-350 patient-years. While HbA(1c) reduction does not reach statistical significance in all reported studies, improvement of blood glucose stability and reduction of severe hypoglycaemia appear as constant characteristics of this therapy. When compared to subcutaneous insulin therapy in randomized controlled studies, implantable pumps allow significantly reduced blood glucose fluctuations and improved quality of life in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients, and a significant weight decrease in type 2 diabetic patients. While the EVADIAC registry shows the reduced occurrence of pump-pocket complications thanks to preventive measures and a lower incidence of catheter obstructions following improvements of catheter design, underdelivery due to insulin aggregation in pumps remains a recurrent although reversible issue. Determinants of increased anti-insulin antibody production in some patients remain elusive but impact on blood glucose control is limited in most cases. Conclusion From analyzed data, the EVADIAC group states that…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabet.2006.10.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renard, E., & Schaepelynck-Bélicar, P.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
158-166
ISSN
1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979988746
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
implantable insulin pump, insulin pump therapy, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, HbA1c, insulin antibodies, catheter occlusion, insulin aggregation, weight loss, quality of life
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Equipment Design, Humans, Insulin Infusion Systems, Safety, Multicenter Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review