Validation of a simple index (SIisOGTT) of insulin sensitivity in a population of sedentary men
Abstract
Aim The ongoing obesity epidemic is associated with numerous health problems related to altered metabolic function. Among these is type 2 diabetes, characterized by lowered insulin sensitivity (IS). Consequently, the development of simple indices to assess IS has research and clinical importance. The SI(is)OGTT, a new index of IS, was recently described by Bastard et al. (Diabetes & Metabolism 2007;33:261-8), and validated in sedentary, non-diabetic, overweight and obese postmenopausal women. The aim of the present study was to validate the index in men.Methods The data used in this project came from sedentary men (n=36), aged 34-53 years, all of whom underwent a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp and 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Correlations with M/I (glucose infusion rate [GIR] divided by insulin concentration), GIR and GIR divided by fat-free mass (FFM) were obtained by four well-known indices (HOMA, QUICKI, Cederholm and Matsuda) as well as with the new SI(is)OGTT index. Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman analyses were obtained for every index versus clamp value.Results The best correlate of IS in the present study was the SI(is)OGTT (r=0.84, P<0.0001). The agreement of this method with the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp, as assessed by Bland-Altman plots, was similar to those of the other indices and to those previously described in postmenopausal women.Conclusion The new index proposed by Bastard et al. is as good a predictor of IS in sedentary men as the other commonly used indices, and appears to be as reliable in this population as it was in the original study of postmenopausal women.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Cederholm index of peripheral insulin sensitivity has been validated against the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.
“Glucose and insulin concentrations during the OGTT were used to calculate the Cederholm index of peripheral insulin sensitivity (32), which has been validated against the hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp (33).”
From Simvastatin Effects on Skeletal Muscle (2013) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Pigeon, E., Riou, M. E., St-Onge, J., Couillard, E., Tremblay, A., Marette, A., Weisnagel, S. J., & Joanisse, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Centre hospitalier de l'Université Laval (CA)
- Venue
- Diabetes & Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 398-403
- ISSN
- 1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031816675
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- insulin sensitivity, oral glucose tolerance test, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, sedentary men, type 2 diabetes, obesity, HOMA, QUICKI, Matsuda index, fat-free mass, glucose infusion rate, index validation, measurement agreement
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index, Sedentary Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review