Cited by 56Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesDiabetes Management and Research

Post-bypass hypoglycaemia: A review of current findings

Ritz, P., Hanaire, H.·2011·Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Gastric bypass is one of the most efficient strategies for long-term weight loss and reduction of the comorbidities associated with morbid obesity. Of the complications secondary to gastric bypass, hypoglycaemic episodes have so far been poorly studied. The present study is a comprehensive report of the fewer than 100 cases described in the literature. It shows that strict diagnostic criteria should be applied to differentiate true intense neuroglucopenic symptoms associated with low glucose values (<2.8 mmol/L) from the more frequent symptoms of the dumping syndrome and those occurring in the context of lower-than-normal plasma glucose concentrations. The pancreatic beta-cell hyperfunction initially deemed responsible for hypoglycaemic episodes because of frequent islet abnormalities is described and reappraised in this report. The few validated therapeutic options are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.04.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some clinicians consider plasma glucose concentrations <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) to be indicative of post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia, whereas others regard levels <3.3 mmol/L (60 mg/dL) diagnostic of hypoglycemia.

    “To date, no definitive guidance regarding cutoff values for plasma glucose has been established, but some clinicians consider plasma glucose concentrations <2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) to be indicative of post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia, whereas others regard levels <3.3 mmol/L (60 mg/dL) diagnostic of hypoglycemia (33).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ritz, P., & Hanaire, H.
Affiliations
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
Corresponding author
Ritz, P.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
274-281
ISSN
1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026431877
Cited by
56
References
56
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gastric bypass, morbid obesity, bariatric surgery complications, dumping syndrome, neuroglycopenic symptoms, Whipple's triad, hypoglycemia treatment
MeSH terms
Dumping Syndrome, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Gastric Bypass, Nesidioblastosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review