Prevalence and risk factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes
Abstract
Introduction Our objective was to assess the frequency of lipohypertrophy (LH) and its relationship to site rotation, needle reuse, glucose variability, hypoglycaemia and use of insulin. Methods The study included 430 outpatients injecting insulin who filled out a wide-ranging questionnaire regarding their injection technique. Then, a diabetes nurse examined their injection sites for the presence of LH. Results Nearly two-thirds (64.4%) of patients had LH. There was a strong relationship between the presence of LH and non-rotation of sites, with correct rotation technique having the strongest protective value against LH. Of the patients who correctly rotated sites, only 5% had LH while, of the patients with LH, 98% either did not rotate sites or rotated incorrectly. Also, 39.1% of patients with LH had unexplained hypoglycaemia and 49.1% had glycaemic variability compared with only 5.9% and 6.5%, respectively, in those without LH. LH was also related to needle reuse, with risk increasing significantly when needles were used > 5 times. Total daily insulin doses for patients with and without LH averaged 56 and 41 IU/day, respectively. This 15 IU difference equates to a total annual cost to the Spanish healthcare system of > €122 million. This was also the first study in which the use of ultrasound allowed the description of an "echo signature" for LH. Conclusion Correct injection site rotation appears to be the critical factor in preventing LH, which is associated with reduced g…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lipohypertrophy is common and typically occurs when the same sites are repeatedly used for injections or pump sites; it leads to use of higher insulin doses and is a cause of glycemic variability, leading to both hyper- and hypoglycemia.
“Lipohypertrophy is common and typically occurs when the same sites are repeatedly used for injections or pump sites; it leads to use of higher insulin doses and is a cause of glycemic variability, leading to both hyper-and hypoglycemia (95,96).”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 276
- Authors
- Blanco, M., Hernández, M. T., Strauss, K. W., & Amaya, M.
- Affiliations
- Novartis (Spain) (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Strauss, K.W.
- Venue
- Diabetes & Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 445-453
- ISSN
- 1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982984639
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
- Keywords
- lipohypertrophy, insulin injection, injection site rotation, needle reuse, hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, insulin dose, diabetes complications, health care costs, injection technique, risk factors, prevalence, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, patient education, diabetes self-management education
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypertrophy, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Risk Factors, Spain, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Guidelines as Topic, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review