Cited by 20Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Glycaemic control for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy is more than fasting plasma glucose and glycated haemoglobin

Pai, Y.-W., Tang, C.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, S.-Y., Lee, I.-T., Chang, M.-H.·2021·Diabetes & Metabolism

Abstract

Background The relationship between postprandial hyperglycaemia and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), whether painful or painless, has yet to be determined. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted in adults with T2D between January and October 2013. Blood samples were collected after overnight fasting every 3 months prior to enrolment. For this study, increased postprandial glycaemic exposure was defined as high glycated haemoglobin (HbA 1c) and near-normal mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels. Both painless and painful DPN were evaluated using two validated tools, the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) questionnaire.Results This study included 1040 participants with mean FPG levels<140mg/dL, 535 of which were<126mg/dL. Of these patients, 200/1040 (19.2%) and 105/535 (19.6%) had DPN. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher HbA 1c levels (≥7%) did not increase risk of painless DPN, but did significantly increase risk of painful DPN in T2D patients with FPG<140mg/dL and<126mg/dL, with corresponding odds ratios of 2.49 and 3.77 (95% confidence intervals: 1.09-5.71 and 1.20-11.79), respectively, after adjusting for demographic factors, diabetes-related variables and comorbidities.Conclusion This study is the first to reveal that increased postprandial glycaemic exposure, as assessed by high HbA1c and near-normal FPG levels, is associated with an increased risk of painful DPN in adults with T2D.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.04.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 20

Authors
Pai, Y.-W., Tang, C.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, S.-Y., Lee, I.-T., & Chang, M.-H.
Affiliations
Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, I.-T.
  • Chang, M.-H.
Venue
Diabetes & Metabolism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
101158
ISSN
1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3024627752
Cited by
20
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (1093404C, TCVGH 1083404C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetic peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathic pain, postprandial hyperglycemia, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Adult, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetic Neuropathies, Fasting, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review