Physical activity and diabetes mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study of 0.5 million US people
Abstract
Aim To examine the association between physical activity and the cause of death with the greatest risk related to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a large population-based cohort representative of the general US adult population.Methods A total of 41,726 adults suffering from T2DM (age 62 ± 14 years) and 459,660 adults without diabetes (age 46 ± 18 years) who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 1997 to 2014 were included in this prospective cohort study. Self-reported moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was categorized into inactive, insufficiently active, active and very active. Mortality data was obtained from the National Death Index. Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders were performed to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).Results Diabetes mortality cause showed the highest relative risk of death among adults with T2DM compared to adults without diabetes (HR 5.72 [3.15;10.39]). There was a non-linear inverse dose-response association between MVPA and diabetes mortality among adults with T2DM, up to a plateau in risk reduction at approximately 500 min/week. Any level of activity was inversely associated with a significantly lower risk of diabetes mortality compared with being inactive (insufficiently active HR 0.71[0.54;0.97], active HR 0.68 [0.49;0.95], very active HR 0.44 [0.32;0.60]). Compared to adults without diabetes, the risk of diabetes mortality decreased from HR 7.38 [4.00;13.58] for inactive people with T2DM to HR 3.34 [1.76;6.32] for very active people with T2DM.Conclusions Higher levels of MVPA were associated with lower risk of diabetes mortality among adults with T2DM.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In this study, a 70% risk reduction in all-cause mortality was seen at the inflection point of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (300 min/week), which was larger than the 55% at 500 min/week by self-report in a US study of 41,726 diabetic adults.
“In our study, a 70% of risk reduction in all-cause mortality was seen at the inflection point of MVPA (300 min/week), larger than the 55% at 500 min/week by self-report in a US study of 41,726 diabetic adults21.”
From Accelerometer-derived physical activity and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Beltran-Valls, M. R., Cabanas-Sánchez, V., Sadarangani, K. P., Rodríguez-Artalejo, F., Moliner-Urdiales, D., & Martínez-Gómez, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad San Sebastián (CL)
- Venue
- Diabetes & Metabolism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101410
- ISSN
- 1262-3636 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4309200198
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repositori UJI (Universitat Jaume I) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (IJC2018–038008-I)
- Universitat Jaume I (E-2020–08)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, physical activity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, diabetes mortality, cause-specific mortality, dose-response relationship, physical inactivity, mortality risk reduction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk, Risk Factors, Exercise, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review