Flexible eating and flexible insulin dosing in patients with diabetes: Results of an intensive self-management course
Abstract
Aims To evaluate the outcomes of an established programme to teach patients to match their insulin dose to their carbohydrate intake. Research design and methods A prospective observational study in Australia (Newcastle, NSW) of 137 consecutive patients with type 1 (n=82) or type 2 diabetes (n=55) over two successive years. Four educational principles were used to teach intensive insulin management and diabetes self-care skills including: carbohydrate counting and insulin dose adjustment, exercise, appropriate treatment of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, managing sickness, problem solving, communication with health professionals, goal setting, and the importance of support. Outcomes included changes at 4 and 12 months in HbA1c, self-efficacy measured by a diabetes empowerment scale (DES), diabetes specific quality of life (ADDQoL), and problem solving. Both intention to treat and efficacy analyses were performed. Results Diabetes-related quality of life and diabetes problem solving skills improved significantly. Excluding 16 people who failed to adopt intensive insulin management and 24 who started with an HbA1c less than 7%, intention to treat analysis showed the average HbA1c fell from 8.7% initially to 8.1% at 12 months and the number of people with an HbA1c of less than 8% rose from 67 (48.9%) before the program to 86 (62.8%) afterwards. Conclusions An intensive diabetes self-management program led to improvements in HbA1c, empowerment, and quality of life that were largely sustained at 1 year. This is all the more remarkable given that the intervention was once only, entailed no long-term follow-up, and took place in normal clinical operations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For individuals with type 1 diabetes, intensive insulin therapy using the carbohydrate counting approach can result in improved glycemia.
“For individuals with type 1 diabetes, intensive insulin therapy using the carbohydrate counting approach can result in improved glycemia and is recommended.”
From Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report (2019) · cites this paper as [269]
For individuals with type 1 diabetes, intensive insulin therapy using the carbohydrate counting approach can result in improved glycemia.
“For individuals with type 1 diabetes, intensive insulin therapy using the carbohydrate counting approach can result in improved glycemia and is recommended.”
From Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report (2019) · cites this paper as [270]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 92
- Authors
- Lowe, J., Linjawi, S., Mensch, M., James, K., & Attia, J.
- Affiliations
- Hunter New England Local Health District (AU)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 439-443
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118823335
- Cited by
- 92
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- diabetes self-management education, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, carbohydrate counting, insulin dose adjustment, HbA1c, diabetes self-efficacy, diabetes-related quality of life, problem-solving skills, hypoglycemia management, hyperglycemia management, Diabetes Empowerment Scale, ADDQoL
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cooking, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Eating, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review