The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus—Practical implications
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Guidelines from the ADA and WHO recommend alternative diagnostic approaches, such as fasting glucose, OGTT, or short-term glycation markers (such as fructosamine and glycated albumin), when hemoglobinopathies are suspected or confirmed (47,48).”
From Comparison of point‑of‑care HbA1c devices with laboratory HPLC methods: A systematic review and meta‑analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [47]
Citations
Cites
Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
(2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.03.012 · Cited by 462
2010 Consensus statement on the worldwide standardization of the hemoglobin A1c measurement
Hanås, R., & John, G. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.05.011 · Cited by 36
Is HbA1c a valid and feasible tool for the diagnosis of diabetes?
Kowall, B., Rathmann, W., & Landgraf, R. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.06.024 · Cited by 17
Mismatch between diabetes diagnosis in primary care and recommended diagnostic criteria
Colagiuri, S. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2010.11.037 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vounzoulaki, E., Khunti, K., Abner, S. C., Tan, B. K., Davies, M. J., & Gillies, C. L. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m1361 · Cited by 1,150
HbA1c: A Review of Analytical and Clinical Aspects
Weykamp, C. W. (2013) · Annals of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.3343/alm.2013.33.6.393 · Cited by 418
Is breath acetone a biomarker of diabetes? A historical review on breath acetone measurements
Wang, Z., & Wang, C. (2013) · Journal of Breath Research · doi:10.1088/1752-7155/7/3/037109 · Cited by 319
Diabetes mellitus – Definition, Klassifikation, Diagnose, Screening und Prävention (Update 2023)
Harreiter, J., & Roden, M. (2023) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-022-02122-y · Cited by 352
Diabetes mellitus – Definition, Klassifikation, Diagnose, Screening und Prävention (Update 2019)
Harreiter, J., & Roden, M. (2019) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-019-1450-4 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Colagiuri, S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Colagiuri, Stephen
- ORCID
- Colagiuri, Stephen
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 312-313
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071551339
- Cited by
- 126
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- HbA1c, diabetes diagnosis, WHO diagnostic criteria, quality assurance, assay standardization, diabetes monitoring, clinical practice implications
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
