Cited by 92Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus and its prevalence in Bangladesh

Jesmin, Subrina, Akter, Shamima, Akashi, Hidechika, Al-Mamun, Abdullah, Rahman, Md. Arifur, Islam, Md. Majedul, Sohael, Farzana, Okazaki, Osamu +3 more·2014·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background The prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has important health complications for both mother and child and is increasing all over the world. Although prevalence estimates for GDM are not new in developed and many developing countries, data are lacking for many low-income countries like Bangladesh. Objective To evaluate the prevalence of GDM in Bangladesh. Research design and methods This cross-sectional study included 3447 women who consecutively visited the antenatal clinics with an average gestation age of 26 weeks. GDM was defined according to WHO criteria (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ≥7.0 mmol/L or 2-h ≥7.8 mmol/L) and the new ADA criteria (FPG ≥5.3 mmol/L or 2-h ≥8.6 mmol/L OGTT). We also calculated overt diabetes as FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L. Results Prevalence of GDM was 9.7% according to the WHO criteria and 12.9% according to the ADA criteria in this study population. Prevalence of overt diabetes was 1.8%. Women with GDM were older, higher educated, had higher household income, higher parity, parental history of diabetes, and more hypertensive, compared with non-GDM women. Conclusion This study demonstrates a high prevalence of GDM in Bangladesh. These estimates for GDM may help to formulate new policies to prevent and manage diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.024

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Bangladesh, Jesmin et al. in 2014 studied 3447 pregnant women; total GDM prevalence was 9.7% by WHO 1999 and 12.9% by ADA criteria.

    “The results were 9.7% according to the WHO 1999 guidelines and 12.9% according to the ADA criteria [215].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jesmin, S., Akter, S., Akashi, H., Al-Mamun, A., Rahman, M. A., Islam, M. M., Sohael, F., Okazaki, O., Moroi, M., Kawano, S., & Mizutani, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
  • National Center for Global Health and Medicine (JP)
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
103
Issue
1
Pages
57-62
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963553223
Cited by
92
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (23406016, 23406029, 23406037, 24406026, 25305034)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, prevalence, screening, Bangladesh, prenatal screening, fasting blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, overt diabetes, risk factors, maternal diabetes
MeSH terms
Adult, Bangladesh, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Fasting, Female, Gestational Age, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Parity, Pregnancy, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review