Diabetes incidence and influencing factors in women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus: A 15 year population-based follow-up cohort study
Abstract
Aim Very few extensive follow-up investigations evaluating patients with history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have been documented. We conducted this longitudinal study to estimate the incidence of diabetes and its predictors in women with and without GDM. Method A total of 2458 eligible women, aged 20-50years (476 with GDM and 1982 without GDM) were selected from among participants of the Tehran Lipid and Glucose study, based on the World Health Organization definition for GDM screening. Pooled logistic regression was used to assess the association between time-dependent covariates and diabetes. Results The incidence rate of diagnosed diabetes was 9/1000 for women with GDM and 4/1000 for their counterparts, without GDM. Kaplan-Meier curve indicated a significantly shorter median time for developing diabetes in women with a history of GDM (6.95years [IQ: 4.22-10.71]), compared to their healthy peers (8.45years [IQ: 5.08-10.89]). BMI and previous family history of diabetes were found as major risk factors for future diabetes in women with GDM. Conclusion The results presented here lead to better identification and selection of at-risk women with prior GDM history.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women with prior GDM had shorter median time for developing diabetes compared to those without GDM (6.95 vs 8.45 years).
“Moreover, women with prior GDM had shorter median time for developing diabetes compared to those without GDM [6.95 years (IQ: 4.22–10.71)] vs, [8.45 years [(IQ: 5.08–10.89)] [32].”
From Trend of various adiposity indices in women with and without history of gestational diabetes: a population-based cohort study (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Minooee, S., Ramezani Tehrani, F., Rahmati, M., Mansournia, M. A., & Azizi, F.
- Affiliations
- Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (IR)
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 128
- Pages
- 24-31
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2606784636
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, diabetes incidence, type 2 diabetes risk factors, body mass index, family history of diabetes, women, Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Diabetes, Gestational, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review