Cited by 30Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Screening for gestational diabetes in Tuscany, Italy. A population study

Di Cianni, Graziano, Gualdani, Elisa, Berni, Cecilia, Meucci, Alessandra, Roti, Lorenzo, Lencioni, Cristina, Lacaria, Emilia, Seghieri, Giuseppe +1 more·2017·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims According to current Italian guidelines, only women at higher risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) are eligible for receiving a glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during pregnancy. This study evaluates the compliance to national guidelines, additionally proposing an algorithm able to identify women with GDM. Methods The study included 23,270 pregnant women aged >15yr, resident in Tuscany, a region in central Italy, delivering in year 2015, identified by certificates of care at delivery. Eligibility to screening was evaluated by fulfillment to regional guidelines recommending a 2-h-75g-OGTT only in presence of risk factors. Additionally, a validated algorithm is proposed to diagnose GDM from regional administrative databases. Results Glucose tolerance was tested in 79.2% of women. Eligibility criteria were fulfilled in 55.6% of OGTT performers and in 40.2% of those who didn't perform any OGTT. Performers' rate increased with age, body weight, higher education degree and in those followed by a well defined clinical setting. Housewives and students had a lower chance of receiving an OGTT. Algorithm identified GDM in 11% of women, ranging from 14% among eligible and 7% among non-eligible ones. Conclusion Selective screening for GDM is not being currently applied in Tuscany. Despite the percentage of eligible women by national guidelines was 55%, the rate of those who performed the screening was about 80%, with a 40% of low risk women continuing to be screened. Moreover, GDM rate, calculated by algorithm, was relatively large (7%) among non-eligible women, suggesting the need of universal glucose screening to adequately capture all GDM cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.08.003

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2010 Italy adopted IADPSG/WHO 2013 as universal screening criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus, but in September 2011 the Italian Public Health Authority changed to selective screening because the level of GDM diagnoses was too high using the new criteria.

    “In 2010 Italy accepted and adopted the IADPSG/WHO 2013 as the universal screening criteria for GDM, but in September 2011, the Italian Public Health Authority changed the GDM guidelines and decided on selective screening. The reason was due to the fact that the level of GDM diagnoses was too high using the new criteria.”
  • In Tuscany, the gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence rate was 11%.

    “Di Canni et al. confirmed the GDM prevalence rate—at 11% when analyzing data from Tuscany.”
  • In Italy, only 55% performed OGTTs according to national guidelines.

    “Additionally, they consented that with the lack of proper screening—only 55% performed OGTTs according national guidelines.”
  • In Italy, the gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence among non-eligible pregnant patients was 7.0%, suggesting a need for universal screening.

    “Moreover, the researchers also suggested the need for universal screening, due to the relatively high (7.0%) GDM prevalence level among non-eligible pregnant patients [117].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Cianni, G., Gualdani, E., Berni, C., Meucci, A., Roti, L., Lencioni, C., Lacaria, E., Seghieri, G., & Francesconi, P.
Affiliations
  • Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana (IT)
  • Ospedale di Livorno (IT)
Corresponding author
Seghieri, Giuseppe
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
132
Pages
149-156
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750438249
Cited by
30
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, glucose tolerance test, prenatal screening, screening guideline compliance, risk factors, diagnostic algorithm, administrative health databases, universal screening, Tuscany
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Italy, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review