Screening for gestational diabetes in Tuscany, Italy. A population study
Abstract
Aims According to current Italian guidelines, only women at higher risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) are eligible for receiving a glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during pregnancy. This study evaluates the compliance to national guidelines, additionally proposing an algorithm able to identify women with GDM. Methods The study included 23,270 pregnant women aged >15yr, resident in Tuscany, a region in central Italy, delivering in year 2015, identified by certificates of care at delivery. Eligibility to screening was evaluated by fulfillment to regional guidelines recommending a 2-h-75g-OGTT only in presence of risk factors. Additionally, a validated algorithm is proposed to diagnose GDM from regional administrative databases. Results Glucose tolerance was tested in 79.2% of women. Eligibility criteria were fulfilled in 55.6% of OGTT performers and in 40.2% of those who didn't perform any OGTT. Performers' rate increased with age, body weight, higher education degree and in those followed by a well defined clinical setting. Housewives and students had a lower chance of receiving an OGTT. Algorithm identified GDM in 11% of women, ranging from 14% among eligible and 7% among non-eligible ones. Conclusion Selective screening for GDM is not being currently applied in Tuscany. Despite the percentage of eligible women by national guidelines was 55%, the rate of those who performed the screening was about 80%, with a 40% of low risk women continuing to be screened. Moreover, GDM rate, calculated by algorithm, was relatively large (7%) among non-eligible women, suggesting the need of universal glucose screening to adequately capture all GDM cases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In 2010 Italy adopted IADPSG/WHO 2013 as universal screening criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus, but in September 2011 the Italian Public Health Authority changed to selective screening because the level of GDM diagnoses was too high using the new criteria.
“In 2010 Italy accepted and adopted the IADPSG/WHO 2013 as the universal screening criteria for GDM, but in September 2011, the Italian Public Health Authority changed the GDM guidelines and decided on selective screening. The reason was due to the fact that the level of GDM diagnoses was too high using the new criteria.”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [117]
In Tuscany, the gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence rate was 11%.
“Di Canni et al. confirmed the GDM prevalence rate—at 11% when analyzing data from Tuscany.”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [117]
In Italy, only 55% performed OGTTs according to national guidelines.
“Additionally, they consented that with the lack of proper screening—only 55% performed OGTTs according national guidelines.”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [117]
In Italy, the gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence among non-eligible pregnant patients was 7.0%, suggesting a need for universal screening.
“Moreover, the researchers also suggested the need for universal screening, due to the relatively high (7.0%) GDM prevalence level among non-eligible pregnant patients [117].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [117]
Cites
Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Pregnancy Outcomes
Crowther, C. A., Hiller, J. E., Moss, J. R., McPhee, A. J., Jeffries, W. S., & Robinson, J. S. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042973 · Cited by 3,159 · see citing works
Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
Metzger, B. E., Lowe, L. P., Dyer, A. R., Trimble, E. R., Chaovarindr, U., Coustan, D. R., Hadden, D. R., McCance, D. R., Hod, M., McIntyre, H. D., et al. (2009) · Obstetric Anesthesia Digest · doi:10.1097/01.aoa.0000344706.95925.dc · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Colagiuri, S., Falavigna, M., Agarwal, M. M., Boulvain, M., Coetzee, E., Hod, M., Meltzer, S. J., Metzger, B., Omori, Y., Rasa, I., et al. (2014) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.02.012 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: it is time for international consensus
Sacks, D. B. (2014) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.206920 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Di Cianni, G., Gualdani, E., Berni, C., Meucci, A., Roti, L., Lencioni, C., Lacaria, E., Seghieri, G., & Francesconi, P.
- Affiliations
- Agenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana (IT)
- Ospedale di Livorno (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Seghieri, Giuseppe
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 149-156
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2750438249
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, glucose tolerance test, prenatal screening, screening guideline compliance, risk factors, diagnostic algorithm, administrative health databases, universal screening, Tuscany
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Italy, Mass Screening, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review