Cited by 19Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Prevalence and geographical distribution of insulin pump therapy in the Central Denmark Region and its association with metabolic parameters

Kampmann, Ulla, Madsen, Lene Ring, Bjerg, Lasse, Witte, Daniel R., Hasselstrøm, Kjeld, Østergård, Torben, Alstrup, Kirsten, Møller, Marianne Kleis +2 more·2018·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims Insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes encompasses multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Both population-based studies and comparative studies regarding CSII use are sparse. The aim of the current study was to describe the prevalence and distribution of CSII use among adults with type 1 diabetes in the Central Denmark Region and to compare metabolic control in CSII-treated patients to those treated with MDI. Methods A database was constructed using the Danish Adult Diabetes Registry in 2014/2015 in combination with an audit of the patients' medical records. Results 3909 adults with type 1 diabetes patients were included. The proportion of patients treated with CSII differed significantly between the 8 regional hospitals from 12.0% to 31.1%. CSII users had a significantly lower HbA1c compared to MDI treated patients (7.6% (60 mmol/mol) versus 8.0% (64 mmol/mol)) in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for clinically relevant characteristics the difference between CSII and MDI-treated patients was attenuated, but remained statistically significant. Conclusion The distribution of CSII differed markedly between hospitals and CSII users had better glycemic control, even after adjustment for sex, age, BMI, diabetes duration, smoking, use of lipid-lowering and blood pressure-lowering medication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.04.042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kampmann, U., Madsen, L. R., Bjerg, L., Witte, D. R., Hasselstrøm, K., Østergård, T., Alstrup, K., Møller, M. K., Dylmer, D., & Hansen, K. W.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Regionshospitalet Viborg (DK)
  • Regional Hospital Randers (DK)
  • Regional Hospital Horsens (DK)
  • Regional Hospital Holstebro (DK)
  • Regionshospitalet Silkeborg (DK)
Corresponding author
Kampmann, Ulla
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
141
Pages
148-155
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802690760
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk Fonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
insulin pump therapy, type 1 diabetes, multiple daily insulin injections, glycemic control, HbA1c, prevalence, hospital variation, Central Denmark Region
MeSH terms
Adult, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review