Cited by 24Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes and associated disorders

Estimated insulin sensitivity in Type 1 diabetes adults using clinical and research biomarkers

Januszewski, Andrzej S., Sachithanandan, Nirupa, Ward, Glenn, Karschimkus, Connie S., O'Neal, David N., Jenkins, Alicia J.·2020·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aims Insulin resistance in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is associated with increased risk of chronic complications and death. The gold standard to quantify insulin sensitivity, a euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp, is not applicable to clinical practice. We have employed clamp studies to develop a panel of formulae to estimate insulin sensitivity in adults with T1D for use in clinical practice and trials. Methods Clamps were conducted in 28 adults with T1D, who were also characterised with 38 clinical and research biomarkers. Exhaustive search analysis was used to derive equations correlating with clamp-quantified glucose disposal rate (GDR), GDR/plasma insulin (M/I) and log 10 M/I. Results Measured insulin sensitivity correlated with BMI, WHR, HDL-C, adipokines and inflammation markers on univariate analysis. Exhaustive search analysis derived three formulae correlating with clamp-derived GDR and logM/I (p Conclusions The performance of formulae using routinely available parameters with/without research biomarkers in clinical studies and trials, particularly related to future complications, relevant lifestyle interventions, insulin delivery modes and insulin sensitisers is merited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108359

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Januszewski, A. S., Sachithanandan, N., Ward, G., Karschimkus, C. S., O'Neal, D. N., & Jenkins, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Januszewski, Andrzej S.
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
167
Pages
108359
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046844445
Cited by
24
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Melbourne
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Australia
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance, glucose disposal rate, hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, prediction equations, clinical biomarkers, adipokines, inflammatory markers, HDL cholesterol, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, pulse pressure
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Glucose Clamp Technique, Biomarkers, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review