Cited by 67Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes Management and Research

Prediction of complications of type 2 Diabetes: A Machine learning approach

Nicolucci, Antonio, Romeo, Luca, Bernardini, Michele, Vespasiani, Marco, Rossi, Maria Chiara, Petrelli, Massimiliano, Ceriello, Antonio, Di Bartolo, Paolo +2 more·2022·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aim To construct predictive models of diabetes complications (DCs) by big data machine learning, based on electronic medical records. Methods Six groups of DCs were considered: eye complications, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease, nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy. A supervised, tree-based learning approach (XGBoost) was used to predict the onset of each complication within 5 years (task 1). Furthermore, a separate prediction for early (within 2 years) and late (3-5 years) onset of complication (task 2) was performed. A dataset of 147.664 patients seen during 15 years by 23 centers was used. External validation was performed in five additional centers. Models were evaluated by considering accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results For all DCs considered, the predictive models in task 1 showed an accuracy > 70 %, and AUC largely exceeded 0.80, reaching 0.97 for nephropathy. For task 2, all predictive models showed an accuracy > 70 % and an AUC > 0.85. Sensitivity in predicting the early occurrence of the complication ranged between 83.2 % (peripheral vascular disease) and 88.5 % (nephropathy). Conclusions Machine learning approach offers the opportunity to identify patients at greater risk of complications. This can help overcoming clinical inertia and improving the quality of diabetes care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 67

Authors
Nicolucci, A., Romeo, L., Bernardini, M., Vespasiani, M., Rossi, M. C., Petrelli, M., Ceriello, A., Di Bartolo, P., Frontoni, E., & Vespasiani, G.
Affiliations
  • Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology (IT)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Takeda (Italy) (IT)
  • MultiMedica (IT)
Corresponding author
Nicolucci, Antonio
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
190
Pages
110013
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286268364
Cited by
67
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
  • U-PAD Unimc - Open Digital Publications (University of Macerata) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes complications, complication prediction, XGBoost, electronic health records, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular complications, cerebrovascular complications, peripheral vascular disease, risk stratification, clinical inertia
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review