Prediction of complications of type 2 Diabetes: A Machine learning approach
Abstract
Aim To construct predictive models of diabetes complications (DCs) by big data machine learning, based on electronic medical records. Methods Six groups of DCs were considered: eye complications, cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease, nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy. A supervised, tree-based learning approach (XGBoost) was used to predict the onset of each complication within 5 years (task 1). Furthermore, a separate prediction for early (within 2 years) and late (3-5 years) onset of complication (task 2) was performed. A dataset of 147.664 patients seen during 15 years by 23 centers was used. External validation was performed in five additional centers. Models were evaluated by considering accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results For all DCs considered, the predictive models in task 1 showed an accuracy > 70 %, and AUC largely exceeded 0.80, reaching 0.97 for nephropathy. For task 2, all predictive models showed an accuracy > 70 % and an AUC > 0.85. Sensitivity in predicting the early occurrence of the complication ranged between 83.2 % (peripheral vascular disease) and 88.5 % (nephropathy). Conclusions Machine learning approach offers the opportunity to identify patients at greater risk of complications. This can help overcoming clinical inertia and improving the quality of diabetes care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Machine learning models can improve discrimination or reclassification in derivation datasets, especially when longitudinal or high-dimensional EHR features are available.
“Rather than focusing on isolated “best-case” results, the more consistent message across the literature is that machine learning models can improve discrimination or reclassification in derivation datasets, especially when longitudinal or high-dimensional EHR features are available (8, 11–13).”
From AI-driven cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with diabetes: bridging algorithmic innovation to equitable clinical application (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of employing ML techniques to utilize various data types for identifying and predicting the risk of DKD in T2DM patients.
“Previous studies have demonstrated the feasibility of employing ML techniques to utilize various date types for identifying and predicting the risk of DKD in T2DM patients (26, 27).”
From Machine learning-based risk predictive models for diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Nicolucci, A., Romeo, L., Bernardini, M., Vespasiani, M., Rossi, M. C., Petrelli, M., Ceriello, A., Di Bartolo, P., Frontoni, E., & Vespasiani, G.
- Affiliations
- Center for Outcomes Research and Clinical Epidemiology (IT)
- Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
- Takeda (Italy) (IT)
- MultiMedica (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Nicolucci, Antonio
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 190
- Pages
- 110013
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4286268364
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
- Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
- U-PAD Unimc - Open Digital Publications (University of Macerata) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, diabetes complications, complication prediction, XGBoost, electronic health records, diabetic nephropathy, diabetic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, cardiovascular complications, cerebrovascular complications, peripheral vascular disease, risk stratification, clinical inertia
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review