The utility of first trimester plasma glycated CD59 (pGCD59) in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective study of non-diabetic pregnant women in Ireland
Open accessAbstract
Aims To evaluate the ability of first trimester plasma glycated CD59 (pGCD59) to predict gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) at 24–28 weeks of gestation. Methods Prospectively, in 378 pregnant women, GDM was diagnosed using the one step 2 h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test adjudicated by the World Health Organisation (WHO) 2013 criteria. The ability of pGCD59 to predict GDM was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves adjusted for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), maternal ethnicity, parity, previous GDM, family history of diabetes mellitus and week of gestation at time of pGCD59 sampling. Results pGCD59 generated an adjusted area under the curve (AUC) of (a) 0.63 (95 %CI:0.56–0.70, p < 0.001) for predicting GDM, and (b) 0.71 (95 %CI:0.62–0.79, p < 0.001 for GDM diagnosed with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 5.1 mmol/L. Sensitivity analysis of BMI subgroups showed that pGCD59 generated the highest AUC in the 35 kg/m 2 ≤ BMI < 40 kg/m 2 (AUC:0.85, 95 %CI:0.70–0.98) and BMI ≥ 40 kg/m 2 (AUC:0.88, 95 %CI:0.63–0.99) categories. Conclusions Early in pregnancy, pGCD59 may be a good predictor of GDM in women with a high BMI and a fair predictor of GDM diagnosed by an elevated FPG independent of BMI.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Ireland, Bogdanet et al. found GDM prevalence of 11.4%.
“Similar outcomes were assessed by Bogdanet et al., in their study GDM prevalence was 11.4% [161].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [161]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wexler, D. J., Powe, C. E., Barbour, L. A., Buchanan, T., Coustan, D. R., Corcoy, R., Damm, P., Dunne, F., Feig, D. S., Ferrara, A., et al. (2018) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002726 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationPlasma glycated CD59, a novel biomarker for detection of pregnancy-induced glucose intolerance
Ghosh, P., Luque-Fernandez, M. A., Vaidya, A., Ma, D., Sahoo, R., Chorev, M., Zera, C., McElrath, T. F., Williams, M. A., Seely, E. W., et al. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2598 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [1]Raets L. Beunen K. Benhalima K. Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Early Pregnancy: What Is the Evidence? J Clin Med 10 6 2021 PMC8003050 33803650
- [2]Simmons D. Hague W.M. Teede H.J. Cheung N.W. Hibbert E.J. Nolan C.J. Hyperglycaemia in early pregnancy: the Treatment of Booking Gestational diabetes Mellitus (TOBOGM) study. A randomised controlled trial Med J Aust 209 9 2018 405 406 29793404
- [4]Davies A. Lachmann P.J. Membrane defence against complement lysis: the structure and biological properties of CD59 Immunol Res 12 3 1993 258 275 7507156
- [5]Ghosh P. Sahoo R. Vaidya A. Cantel S. Kavishwar A. Goldfine A. A specific and sensitive assay for blood levels of glycated CD59: a novel biomarker for diabetes Am J Hematol 88 8 2013 670 676 23670858 PMC3775575
- [7]Ma D. Luque-Fernandez M.A. Bogdanet D. Desoye G. Dunne F. Halperin J.A. Plasma Glycated CD59 Predicts Early Gestational Diabetes and Large for Gestational Age Newborns J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105 4 2020 PMC7082084 32069353
- [8]Bogdanet D. O'Shea P.M. Halperin J. Dunne F. Plasma glycated CD59 (gCD59), a novel biomarker for the diagnosis, management and follow up of women with Gestational Diabetes (GDM) - protocol for prospective cohort study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 20 1 2020 412 32682411 PMC7368790
- [9]Metzger B.E. Gabbe S.G. Persson B. Buchanan T.A. Catalano P.A. Damm P. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy Diabetes Care 33 3 2010 676 682 20190296 PMC2827530
- [10]O'Sullivan E.P. Avalos G. O'Reilly M. Dennedy M.C. Gaffney G. Dunne F.P. Atlantic DIP: the prevalence and consequences of gestational diabetes in Ireland Ir Med J 105 5 Suppl 2012 13 15 22838101
- [11]Association A.D. Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes–2014 Diabetes Care 37 Suppl 1 2014 S5 S13 24357214
- [12]Carpenter M.W. Coustan D.R. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes Am J Obstet Gynecol 144 7 1982 768 773 7148898
- [13]Accardo-Palumbo A. Colonna-Romano G. Potestio M. Carbone M. Ferrante A. Giardina E. Glucose-induced loss of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane regulators of complement activation (CD59, CD55) by in vitro cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells Diabetologia 43 8 2000 1039 1047 10990082
- [14]Meek C.L. Tundidor D. Feig D.S. Yamamoto J.M. Scott E.M. Ma D.D. Novel Biochemical Markers of Glycemia to Predict Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Type 1 Diabetes Diabetes Care 44 3 2021 681 689 33495292 PMC8051277
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bogdanet, D., Toth Castillo, M., Doheny, H., Dervan, L., Angel Luque-Fernandez, M., Halperin, J., O'Shea, P. M., & Dunne, F. P.
- Affiliations
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- University Hospital Galway (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Bogdanet, Delia
- Doheny, Helen
- Dervan, Louise
- Dunne, Fidelma P.
- Venue
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 190
- Pages
- 110023
- ISSN
- 0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9483034
- OpenAlex
- W4288061013
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics
- Wellcome Trust (203930/B/16/Z, 203930)
- Health Research Board (CTN-2021-006)
- Health Service Executive
- National Institutes of Health (DK-62294, DK-095424)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK118528, R01DK101442, R56DK089206)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, first trimester, biomarker prediction, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, early pregnancy
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Ireland, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Body Mass Index, Diabetes, Gestational, CD59 Antigens, Pregnant People, Pregnant Women
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review