Cited by 344Digital Imaging for Blood DiseasesCell Image Analysis TechniquesClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

A dataset of microscopic peripheral blood cell images for development of automatic recognition systems

Open access
Acevedo, Andrea, Merino, Anna, Alférez, Santiago, Molina, Ángel, Boldú, Laura, Rodellar, José·2020·Data in Brief

Abstract

This article makes available a dataset that was used for the development of an automatic recognition system of peripheral blood cell images using convolutional neural networks [1]. The dataset contains a total of 17,092 images of individual normal cells, which were acquired using the analyzer CellaVision DM96 in the Core Laboratory at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. The dataset is organized in the following eight groups: neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, immature granulocytes (promyelocytes, myelocytes, and metamyelocytes), erythroblasts and platelets or thrombocytes. The size of the images is 360 × 363 pixels, in format jpg, and they were annotated by expert clinical pathologists. The images were captured from individuals without infection, hematologic or oncologic disease and free of any pharmacologic treatment at the moment of blood collection. This high-quality labelled dataset may be used to train and test machine learning and deep learning models to recognize different types of normal peripheral blood cells. To our knowledge, this is the first publicly available set with large numbers of normal peripheral blood cells, so that it is expected to be a canonical dataset for model benchmarking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105474

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BloodMNIST is a 2D dataset based on a dataset of 17,092 images of individual normal cells, organized into 8 classes.

    “The BloodMNIST is based on a dataset26,27 of individual normal cells, captured from individuals without infection, hematologic or oncologic disease and free of any pharmacologic treatment at the moment of blood collection. It contains a total of 17,092 images and is organized into 8 classes.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [1]Acevedo A. Alférez S. Merino A. Puigví L. Rodellar J. Recognition of peripheral blood cell images using convolutional neural networks Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 180 2019 105020 31425939
  2. [2]Piaton E. Recommandations techniques et règles de bonne pratique pour la coloration de May-Grünwald-Giemsa: Revue de la littérature et apport de l'assurance qualité Ann. Pathol. 35 4 2015 294 305 26188673
  3. [3]Alférez S. Merino A. Bigorra L. Mujica L. Ruiz M. Rodellar J. Automatic recognition of atypical lymphoid cells from peripheral blood by digital image analysis Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 143 2015 168 176 25596242
  4. [4]Alférez S. Merino A. Acevedo A. Puigví L. Rodellar J. Color clustering segmentation framework for image analysis of malignant lymphoid cells in peripheral blood Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2019 30730028
  5. [5]Boldú L. Merino A. Alférez S. Molina Á. Acevedo A. Rodellar J. Automatic recognition of different types of acute Leukaemia in PB by image analysis J. Clin Pathol 2019 31256009
  6. [6]Rodellar J. Alférez S. Acevedo A. Molina Á. Merino A. Image processing and machine learning in the morphological analysis of blood cells Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 40 S1 2018 46 53 29741258
  7. [7]Merino A. Puigví L. Boldú L. Alférez S. Rodellar J. Optimizing morphology through blood cell image analysis Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 40 S1 2018 54 61 29741256

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acevedo, A., Merino, A., Alférez, S., Molina, Á., Boldú, L., & Rodellar, J.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universidad del Rosario (CO)
  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Corresponding author
Merino, Anna
Venue
Data in Brief
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
30
Pages
105474
ISSN
2352-3409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015930014
Cited by
344
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 83 · 2025: 94 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
Type
data paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Data in Brief (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
blood cell classification, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, immature granulocytes, erythroblasts, platelets, convolutional neural networks, model benchmarking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review