The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis of focal liver lesions from ultrasound using deep learning
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to create an algorithm that simultaneously detects and characterizes (benign vs. malignant) focal liver lesion (FLL) using deep learning. MATERIALS AND METHODS We trained our algorithm on a dataset proposed during a data challenge organized at the 2018 Journées Francophones de Radiologie. The dataset was composed of 367 two-dimensional ultrasound images from 367 individual livers, captured at various institutions. The algorithm was guided using an attention mechanism with annotations made by a radiologist. The algorithm was then tested on a new data set from 177 patients. RESULTS The models reached mean ROC-AUC scores of 0.935 for FLL detection and 0.916 for FLL characterization over three shuffled three-fold cross-validations performed with the training data. On the new dataset of 177 patients, our models reached a weighted mean ROC-AUC scores of 0.891 for seven different tasks. CONCLUSION This study that uses a supervised-attention mechanism focused on FLL detection and characterization from liver ultrasound images. This method could prove to be highly relevant for medical imaging once validated on a larger independent cohort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning
Zhu, B., Liu, J. Z., Cauley, S. F., Rosen, B. R., & Rosen, M. S. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25988 · Cited by 1,694
Fatigue among Clinicians and the Safety of Patients
Gaba, D. M., & Howard, S. K. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa020846 · Cited by 680
What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?
Holzinger, A., Biemann, C., Pattichis, C. S., & Kell, D. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.09923 · Cited by 636
Larson, D. B., Chen, M. C., Lungren, M. P., Halabi, S. S., Stence, N. V., & Langlotz, C. P. (2018) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017170236 · Cited by 456
Deep learning with convolutional neural network in radiology
Yasaka, K., Akai, H., Kunimatsu, A., Kiryu, S., & Abe, O. (2018) · Japanese Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1007/s11604-018-0726-3 · Cited by 368
The Insidious Problem of Fatigue in Medical Imaging Practice
Reiner, B. I., & Krupinski, E. (2012) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-011-9436-4 · Cited by 88
Cited by
Saba, T. (2020) · Journal of Infection and Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2020.06.033 · Cited by 284
Barriers to Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Healthcare Management: A Systematic Review
Assadullah, M. M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3530598 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmauch, B., Herent, P., Jehanno, P., Dehaene, O., Saillard, C., Aubé, C., Luciani, A., Lassau, N., & Jégou, S.
- Venue
- Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 227-233
- ISSN
- 2211-5684 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2923051440
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of focal liver lesions from ultrasound using deep learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.009
- The paper
- Schmauch, B., Herent, P., Jehanno, P., Dehaene, O., Saillard, C., Aubé, C., Luciani, A., Lassau, N., & Jégou, S. (2019). Diagnosis of focal liver lesions from ultrasound using deep learning. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2019.02.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.