Cited by 46Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Quality of life in children with celiac disease: A paediatric cross-sectional study

Biagetti, Chiara, Gesuita, Rosaria, Gatti, Simona, Catassi, Carlo·2015·Digestive and Liver Disease

Abstract

Background Few studies investigated factors influencing the quality of life of children with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet. Aims To investigate the impact of the gluten-free diet on the psycho-physical well-being of celiac children. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we interviewed 76 celiac and 143 non-celiac children (2-18 years) by using a non-disease specific questionnaire (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Test) and we explored the impact of the diet on social life with an open-ended questionnaire. Scores were compared by Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A quantile regression analysis was used to evaluate the impact of celiac disease on score distribution. Results No significant differences in quality of life were found between the two groups (total score: 84.1 (81.1-87.2) vs 81.5 (79.7-83.4), median (95% CI), patients and controls respectively, p=0.4). Treatment positively affected quality of life in children that showed "intermediate" scores in the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Test. Lowest scores were observed in children reporting a higher number of diet difficulties or co-morbidities. Conclusions Although celiac patients showed an overall good quality of life in comparison with a control group, by using appropriate analytical methods we elicited specific factors contributing to a lower quality of life in patients, such as co-morbidities and difficulties with the diet.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dld.2015.07.009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biagetti, C., Gesuita, R., Gatti, S., & Catassi, C.
Affiliations
Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Biagetti, Chiara
  • Gesuita, Rosaria
  • Gatti, Simona
  • Catassi, Carlo
Venue
Digestive and Liver Disease
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
927-932
ISSN
1590-8658 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109801929
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestive and Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
celiac disease, quality of life, children, gluten-free diet, PedsQL, comorbidities, social life
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Italy, Male, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Case-Control Studies, Diet, Gluten-Free, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review