Cited by 43Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsPharmaceutical studies and practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Quantitative prediction of therapeutic antibody pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in human

Haraya, Kenta, Tachibana, Tatsuhiko, Nezu, Junichi·2017·Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics

Abstract

Prediction of the plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile in human is important to determine the required dose regime. This study proposes an approach for predicting the plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in human based on comprehensive analysis of reported pharmacokinetic data. Optimal scaling exponents from cynomolgus monkey to human for CL, Q, V c, and V p were estimated as 0.8, 0.75, 1.0, and 0.95, respectively. The estimated exponents were used to predict plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile in human from pharmacokinetic data in cynomolgus monkey, and the results had reasonable accuracy with symmetric variability of prediction. Then, data reported for pharmacokinetics in human were used to estimate optimal k a and F after subcutaneous injection. The geometric mean of k a was suitable to predict T max, and F which was estimated from CL was suitable to predict C max. Our approach is useful for predicting the plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in human. Moreover, the study also investigated the possibility of predicting pharmacokinetic parameters of mAbs with increased FcRn binding mutations in human and found that our approach of prediction based on reported pharmacokinetic data may also be applicable to mAbs with these mutations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dmpk.2017.05.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For mAbs, subcutaneous bioavailability appears to be inversely correlated with clearance after intravenous dosing, so that mAbs with lower intravenous clearance exhibit higher subcutaneous bioavailability.

    “For mAbs, subcutaneous bioavailability appears to be inversely correlated with clearance after intravenous dosing, so that mAbs with a lower intravenous clearance exhibit higher subcutaneous bioavailability [87].”

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 43

Metadata

Authors
Haraya, K., Tachibana, T., & Nezu, J.
Corresponding author
Haraya, Kenta
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
208-217
ISSN
1347-4367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619517819
Cited by
43
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, pharmacokinetic prediction, concentration-time profiles, intravenous administration, subcutaneous injection, absorption rate constant, bioavailability
MeSH terms
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Receptors, Fc

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review