The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Quantitative prediction of therapeutic antibody pharmacokinetics after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in human
Abstract
Prediction of the plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile in human is important to determine the required dose regime. This study proposes an approach for predicting the plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in human based on comprehensive analysis of reported pharmacokinetic data. Optimal scaling exponents from cynomolgus monkey to human for CL, Q, V c, and V p were estimated as 0.8, 0.75, 1.0, and 0.95, respectively. The estimated exponents were used to predict plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile in human from pharmacokinetic data in cynomolgus monkey, and the results had reasonable accuracy with symmetric variability of prediction. Then, data reported for pharmacokinetics in human were used to estimate optimal k a and F after subcutaneous injection. The geometric mean of k a was suitable to predict T max, and F which was estimated from CL was suitable to predict C max. Our approach is useful for predicting the plasma/serum mAb concentration-time profile after intravenous and subcutaneous injection in human. Moreover, the study also investigated the possibility of predicting pharmacokinetic parameters of mAbs with increased FcRn binding mutations in human and found that our approach of prediction based on reported pharmacokinetic data may also be applicable to mAbs with these mutations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For mAbs, subcutaneous bioavailability appears to be inversely correlated with clearance after intravenous dosing, so that mAbs with lower intravenous clearance exhibit higher subcutaneous bioavailability.
“For mAbs, subcutaneous bioavailability appears to be inversely correlated with clearance after intravenous dosing, so that mAbs with a lower intravenous clearance exhibit higher subcutaneous bioavailability [87].”
From Subcutaneous Administration of Biotherapeutics: An Overview of Current Challenges and Opportunities (2018) · cites this paper as [87]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Haraya, K., Tachibana, T., & Nezu, J.
- Corresponding author
- Haraya, Kenta
- Venue
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 208-217
- ISSN
- 1347-4367 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2619517819
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, pharmacokinetic prediction, concentration-time profiles, intravenous administration, subcutaneous injection, absorption rate constant, bioavailability
- MeSH terms
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Receptors, Fc
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review