Cited by 342DNA Repair MechanismsCancer-related Molecular PathwaysFungal and yeast genetics research

Dial 9–1–1 for DNA damage: the Rad9–Hus1–Rad1 (9–1–1) clamp complex

Parrilla-Castellar, Edgardo R., Arlander, Sonnet J.H., Karnitz, Larry·2004·DNA Repair

Abstract

Genotoxic stress activates checkpoint signaling pathways that block cell cycle progression, trigger apoptosis, and regulate DNA repair. Studies in yeast and humans have shown that Rad9, Hus1, Rad1, and Rad17 play key roles in checkpoint activation. Three of these proteins-Rad9, Hus1, and Rad1-interact in a heterotrimeric complex (dubbed the 9-1-1 complex), which resembles a PCNA-like sliding clamp, whereas Rad17 is part of a clamp-loading complex that is related to the PCNA clamp loader, replication factor-C (RFC). In response to genotoxic damage, the 9-1-1 complex is loaded around DNA by the Rad17-containing clamp loader. The DNA-bound 9-1-1 complex then facilitates ATR-mediated phosphorylation and activation of Chk1, a protein kinase that regulates S-phase progression, G2/M arrest, and replication fork stabilization. In addition to its role in checkpoint activation, accumulating evidence suggests that the 9-1-1 complex also participates in DNA repair. Taken together, these findings suggest that the 9-1-1 clamp is a multifunctional complex that is loaded onto DNA at sites of damage, where it coordinates checkpoint activation and DNA repair.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.03.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 342

Authors
Parrilla-Castellar, E. R., Arlander, S. J. H., & Karnitz, L.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Karnitz, Larry
Venue
DNA Repair
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
3
Issue
8-9
Pages
1009-1014
ISSN
  • 1568-7856 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-7864
OpenAlex
W1965324768
Cited by
342
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • DNA repair (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
9-1-1 complex, Rad9, Hus1, RAD1, Rad17, DNA damage checkpoint, genotoxic stress, ATR-Chk1 signaling, clamp loading, replication factor C, G2/M cell cycle arrest, S phase progression, replication fork stabilization
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Cycle, Cell Division, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endonucleases, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Models, Biological, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces, Time Factors, Signal Transduction, G2 Phase, S Phase, Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, DNA Repair Enzymes, Replication Protein C

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review