Dial 9–1–1 for DNA damage: the Rad9–Hus1–Rad1 (9–1–1) clamp complex
Abstract
Genotoxic stress activates checkpoint signaling pathways that block cell cycle progression, trigger apoptosis, and regulate DNA repair. Studies in yeast and humans have shown that Rad9, Hus1, Rad1, and Rad17 play key roles in checkpoint activation. Three of these proteins-Rad9, Hus1, and Rad1-interact in a heterotrimeric complex (dubbed the 9-1-1 complex), which resembles a PCNA-like sliding clamp, whereas Rad17 is part of a clamp-loading complex that is related to the PCNA clamp loader, replication factor-C (RFC). In response to genotoxic damage, the 9-1-1 complex is loaded around DNA by the Rad17-containing clamp loader. The DNA-bound 9-1-1 complex then facilitates ATR-mediated phosphorylation and activation of Chk1, a protein kinase that regulates S-phase progression, G2/M arrest, and replication fork stabilization. In addition to its role in checkpoint activation, accumulating evidence suggests that the 9-1-1 complex also participates in DNA repair. Taken together, these findings suggest that the 9-1-1 clamp is a multifunctional complex that is loaded onto DNA at sites of damage, where it coordinates checkpoint activation and DNA repair.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PCNA-like 9-1-1 complex (Rad9-Rad1-Hus1) is recruited preferentially to the 5'-primed single-stranded/double-stranded DNA junction by RPA and the Rad17-RFC clamp loader.
“The PCNA-like clamp 9-1-1 complex (Rad9-Rad1-Hus1) is recruited preferentially to the 5′-primed ssDNA/dsDNA junction by RPA and the clamp loader Rad17-RFC complex [102–105].”
From Functional interplay between ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and DNA repair pathways in oxidative stress (2014) · cites this paper as [103]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 342
- Authors
- Parrilla-Castellar, E. R., Arlander, S. J. H., & Karnitz, L.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karnitz, Larry
- Venue
- DNA Repair
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 1009-1014
- ISSN
- 1568-7856 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-7864
- OpenAlex
- W1965324768
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- DNA repair (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- 9-1-1 complex, Rad9, Hus1, RAD1, Rad17, DNA damage checkpoint, genotoxic stress, ATR-Chk1 signaling, clamp loading, replication factor C, G2/M cell cycle arrest, S phase progression, replication fork stabilization
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Cycle, Cell Division, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endonucleases, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Models, Biological, Protein Binding, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces, Time Factors, Signal Transduction, G2 Phase, S Phase, Apoptosis, Cell Cycle Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins, DNA Repair Enzymes, Replication Protein C
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review