Cited by 76DNA Repair MechanismsNuclear Structure and FunctionDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

UV-DDB-dependent regulation of nucleotide excision repair kinetics in living cells

Nishi, Ryotaro, Alekseev, Sergey, Dinant, Christoffel, Hoogstraten, Deborah, Houtsmuller, Adriaan B., Hoeijmakers, Jan. H.J., Vermeulen, Wim, Hanaoka, Fumio +1 more·2009·DNA Repair

Abstract

Although the basic principle of nucleotide excision repair (NER), which can eliminate various DNA lesions, have been dissected at the genetic, biochemical and cellular levels, the important in vivo regulation of the critical damage recognition step is poorly understood. Here we analyze the in vivo dynamics of the essential NER damage recognition factor XPC fused to the green fluorescence protein (GFP). Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching analysis revealed that the UV-induced transient immobilization of XPC, reflecting its actual engagement in NER, is regulated in a biphasic manner depending on the number of (6-4) photoproducts and titrated by the number of functional UV-DDB molecules. A similar biphasic UV-induced immobilization of TFIIH was observed using XPB-GFP. Surprisingly, subsequent integration of XPA into the NER complex appears to follow only the low UV dose immobilization of XPC. Our results indicate that when only a small number of (6-4) photoproducts are generated, the UV-DDB-dependent damage recognition pathway predominates over direct recognition by XPC, and they also suggest the presence of rate-limiting regulatory steps in NER prior to the assembly of XPA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.02.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 76

Authors
Nishi, R., Alekseev, S., Dinant, C., Hoogstraten, D., Houtsmuller, A. B., Hoeijmakers, J. H. J., Vermeulen, W., Hanaoka, F., & Sugasawa, K.
Affiliations
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Corresponding author
Sugasawa, Kaoru
Venue
DNA Repair
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
767-776
ISSN
  • 1568-7856 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-7864
OpenAlex
W2083159605
Cited by
76
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • DNA repair (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • RIKEN
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Keywords
nucleotide excision repair, XPC, XPA, TFIIH, XPB, 6-4 photoproducts, damage detection, FRAP, repair kinetics
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fibroblasts, Humans, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Kinetics, Ultraviolet Rays, RNA, Small Interfering, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Transcription Factor TFIIH, Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group A Protein, DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review