Cited by 97DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Rare DiseasesCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Human DNA damage response and repair deficiency syndromes: linking genomic instability and cell cycle checkpoint proficiency

Kerzendorfer, Claudia, O’Driscoll, Mark·2009·DNA Repair

Abstract

A plethora of clinically distinct human disorders exist whose underlying cause is a defect in the response to or repair of DNA damage. The clinical spectrum of these conditions provides evidence for the role of the DNA damage response (DDR) in mediating diverse processes such as genomic stability, immune system function and normal human development. Cell lines from these disorders provide a valuable resource to help dissect the consequences of compromised DDR at the molecular level. Here we will discuss some well known, less well known and 'novel' DDR defective disorders with particular reference to the functional interplay between the DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoints. We will describe recent advances in further delineating the genetic basis of Seckel syndrome and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II, which have shed more light on the interplay between the DDR, cycle progression and centrosomes. We will also overview recent developments concerning haploinsufficiency of DDR components and their association with certain genomic disorders such as Miller-Dieker lissencephaly syndrome and Williams-Beuren syndrome. Finally, we will discuss how defects in the DDR result in some unexpected clinical features before describing how the nature of a DDR defect impacts on the management and treatment of individuals with these conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mutations in checkpoint genes cause syndromes with increased cancer proneness or other clinical symptoms, especially neurological defects.

    “The importance of the DNA damage checkpoint in the maintenance of genomic stability is underlined by the existence of many syndromes linked to mutations in checkpoint genes, causing increased cancer proneness or other clinical symptoms, especially neurological defects [13,14]”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [14]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 175 · Cited by 97

Authors
Kerzendorfer, C., & O’Driscoll, M.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
O’Driscoll, Mark
Venue
DNA Repair
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09-02
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
1139-1152
ISSN
  • 1568-7856 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-7864
OpenAlex
W2037517647
Cited by
97
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • DNA repair (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cancer Research UK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
DNA damage response, genomic instability, cell cycle checkpoints, Seckel syndrome, microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II, centrosome, haploinsufficiency, Williams syndrome, genomic disorders, immune function, cell cycle progression
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Syndrome, Gene Dosage, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review