Cited by 83DNA Repair MechanismsFungal and yeast genetics researchBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Putnam, Christopher D., Jaehnig, Eric J., Kolodner, Richard D.·2009·DNA Repair

Abstract

The DNA damage and replication checkpoints are believed to primarily slow the progression of the cell cycle to allow DNA repair to occur. Here we summarize known aspects of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoints including how these responses are integrated into downstream effects on the cell cycle, chromatin, DNA repair, and cytoplasmic targets. Analysis of the transcriptional response demonstrates that it is far more complex and less relevant to the repair of DNA damage than the bacterial SOS response. We also address more speculative questions regarding potential roles of the checkpoint during the normal S-phase and how current evidence hints at a checkpoint activation mechanism mediated by positive feedback that amplifies initial damage signals above a minimum threshold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DNA damage checkpoint response is a signal transduction cascade based mainly on phosphorylation events.

    “The DNA damage checkpoint response consists of a signal transduction cascade mainly based on phosphorylation events; the mechanistic details of the pathway have been recently discussed elsewhere [15,16]”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [15]

  • In budding yeast, Mec1 is the main checkpoint activator after all DNA lesions, while Tel1 is mainly devoted to telomere maintenance; Tel1's redundant checkpoint role appears only without Mec1.

    “This separation of tasks is not found in budding yeast, where Mec1 (the ATR homologue) is the main player of checkpoint activation after all kind of DNA lesions, while Tel1 (the ATM homologue) is especially devoted to telomere maintenance. The redundant role of Tel1 in the DNA damage checkpoint is uncovered only in the absence of Mec1 [15,43].”

    From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 83

Authors
Putnam, C. D., Jaehnig, E. J., & Kolodner, R. D.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig Cancer Research (BE)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Putnam, Christopher D.
Venue
DNA Repair
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09-02
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
974-982
ISSN
  • 1568-7856 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-7864
OpenAlex
W1993755338
Cited by
83
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • DNA repair (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-26017, R37GM026017, R01GM026017)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (ES014811, R01ES014811)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
DNA damage checkpoint, S-phase checkpoint, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cell cycle arrest, chromatin, transcriptional response, SOS response, S phase, positive feedback, checkpoint activation, signal amplification
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA Replication, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Feedback, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review