Checkpoint mechanisms at the intersection between DNA damage and repair
Abstract
In response to genomic insults cells trigger a signal transduction pathway, known as DNA damage checkpoint, whose role is to help the cell to cope with the damage by coordinating cell cycle progression, DNA replication and DNA repair mechanisms. Accumulating evidence suggests that activation of the first checkpoint kinase in the cascade is not due to the lesion itself, but it requires recognition and initial processing of the lesion by a specific repair mechanism. Repair enzymes likely convert a variety of physically and chemically different lesions to a unique common structure, a ssDNA region, which is the checkpoint triggering signal. Checkpoint kinases can modify the activity of repair mechanisms, allowing for efficient repair, on one side, and modulating the generation of the ssDNA signal, on the other. This strategy may be important to allow the most effective repair and a prompt recovery from the damage condition. Interestingly, at least in some cases, if the damage level is low enough the cell can deal with the lesions and it does not need to activate the checkpoint response. On the other hand if damage level is high or if the lesions are not rapidly repairable, checkpoint mechanisms become important for cell survival and preservation of genome integrity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Short single-stranded DNA gaps caused by UV damage result in activation of ATR-dependent repair and checkpoint pathways.
“Several studies implicated that short ssDNA (single-stranded DNA) gaps caused by UV damage results in activation of ATR-dependent repair and checkpoint pathways [14–16].”
From ATR- and ATM-Mediated DNA Damage Response Is Dependent on Excision Repair Assembly during G1 but Not in S Phase of Cell Cycle (2016) · cites this paper as [15]
The 9-1-1 clamp is central at the checkpoint-repair interface.
“One of the key factors at the interface between checkpoint and repair is the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp, and its involvement in such processes has been recently discussed [25].”
From Mind the gap: keeping UV lesions in check (2011) · cites this paper as [25]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 172 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Lazzaro, F., Giannattasio, M., Puddu, F., Granata, M., Pellicioli, A., Plevani, P., & Muzi-Falconi, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Plevani, Paolo
- Muzi-Falconi, Marco
- ORCID
- Venue
- DNA Repair
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1055-1067
- ISSN
- 1568-7856 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-7864
- OpenAlex
- W2107643519
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 172
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- DNA repair (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
- Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- DNA damage checkpoint, checkpoint kinase, single-stranded DNA, DNA damage signaling, cell cycle regulation, DNA replication, genome stability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Cycle, DNA, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, Humans, Ultraviolet Rays, Base Pair Mismatch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review