Cited by 43Animal testing and alternativesStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmaceutical studies and practices

The virtue of translational PKPD modeling in drug discovery: selecting the right clinical candidate while sparing animal lives

Bueters, Tjerk, Ploeger, Bart A., Visser, Sandra A.G.·2013·Drug Discovery Today

Abstract

Translational pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling has been fully implemented at AstraZeneca's drug discovery unit for central nervous system and pain indications to facilitate timely progression of the right compound to clinical studies, simultaneously assuring essential preclinical efficacy and safety knowledge. This review illustrates the impact of a translational PKPD paradigm with examples from drug discovery programs. Paradoxically, laboratory animal use decreased owing to better understanding of in vitro-in vivo relationships, optimized in vivo study designs, meta-analyses and hypothesis testing using simulations. From an ethical and effectivity perspective, we advocate that translational PKPD approaches should be implemented more broadly in drug discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bueters, T., Ploeger, B. A., & Visser, S. A. G.
Affiliations
AstraZeneca (Sweden) (SE)
Corresponding author
Bueters, Tjerk
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
18
Issue
17-18
Pages
853-862
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990797762
Cited by
43
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
AstraZeneca
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, drug discovery, central nervous system drugs, animal use reduction, in vitro-in vivo extrapolation, preclinical study design, meta-analysis, animal welfare
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Testing Alternatives, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Models, Biological, Pharmacokinetics, Species Specificity, Structure-Activity Relationship, Toxicology, Molecular Structure, Risk Assessment, Drug Discovery, Translational Research, Biomedical, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Patient Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review