Cited by 173Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchBipolar Disorder and Treatment

A new generation of antidepressants: an update on the pharmaceutical pipeline for novel and rapid-acting therapeutics in mood disorders based on glutamate/GABA neurotransmitter systems

Open access
Wilkinson, Samuel T., Sanacora, Gerard·2019·Drug Discovery Today

Abstract

Mood disorders represent the largest cause of disability worldwide. The monoaminergic deficiency hypothesis, which has dominated the conceptual framework for researching the pathophysiology of mood disorders and the development of novel treatment strategies, cannot fully explain the underlying neurobiology of mood disorders. Mounting evidence collected over the past two decades suggests the amino acid neurotransmitter systems (glutamate and GABA) serve central roles in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Here, we review progress in the development of compounds that act on these systems as well as their purported mechanisms of action. We include glutamate-targeting drugs, such as racemic ketamine, esketamine, lanicemine (AZD6765), traxoprodil (CP-101,606), EVT-101, rislenemdaz (CERC-301/MK-0657), AVP-786, AXS-05, rapastinel (formerly GLYX-13), apimostinel (NRX-1074/AGN-241660), AV-101, NRX-101, basimglurant (RO4917523), decoglurant (RG-1578/RO4995819), tulrampator (CX-1632/S-47445), and riluzole; and GABA-targeting agents, such as brexanolone (SAGE-547), ganaxolone, and SAGE-217.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.11.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 173

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [46]Paterson B (2015) A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential parallel study of CERC-301 in the adjunctive treatment of subjects with severe depression and recent active suicidal ideation despite antidepressant treatment. Poster/abstract presented at National Network of Depression Centers, Annual Conference, Annual Conference, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Nov 5–6, 2015.

Authors
Wilkinson, S. T., & Sanacora, G.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilkinson, Samuel T.
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
606-615
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900628218
Cited by
173
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS023000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
antidepressants, mood disorders, ketamine, esketamine, risperidone, riluzole, brexanolone, ganaxolone, rapid-acting antidepressants, drug development pipeline
MeSH terms
Animals, Antidepressive Agents, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Humans, Glutamic Acid, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review