Harnessing systematic protein–ligand interaction fingerprints for drug discovery
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Determining protein-ligand interaction characteristics and mechanisms is crucial to the drug discovery process. Here, we review recent progress and successful applications of a systematic protein-ligand interaction fingerprint (IFP) approach for investigating proteome-wide protein-ligand interactions for drug development. Specifically, we review the use of this IFP approach for revealing polypharmacology across the kinome, predicting promising targets from which to design allosteric inhibitors and covalent kinase inhibitors, uncovering the binding mechanisms of drugs of interest, and demonstrating resistant mechanisms of specific drugs. Together, we demonstrate that the IFP strategy is efficient and practical for drug design research for protein kinases as targets and is extensible to other protein families.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning
Wu, Z., Ramsundar, B., Feinberg, E. N., Gomes, J., Geniesse, C., Pappu, A. S., Leswing, K., & Pande, V. (2018) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/c7sc02664a · Cited by 3,107 · see citing works
Cross, D. A. E., Ashton, S. E., Ghiorghiu, S., Eberlein, C., Nebhan, C. A., Spitzler, P. J., Orme, J. P., Finlay, M. R. V., Ward, R. A., Mellor, M. J., et al. (2014) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-0337 · Cited by 2,246 · see citing works
Role of computer-aided drug design in modern drug discovery
Macalino, S. J. Y., Gosu, V., Hong, S., & Choi, S. (2015) · Archives of Pharmacal Research · doi:10.1007/s12272-015-0640-5 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zhao, Z., & Bourne, P. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhao, Zheng
- Bourne, Philip E.
- Venue
- Drug Discovery Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-10
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 103319
- ISSN
- 1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4285601000
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Virginia
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
- Keywords
- protein-ligand interaction fingerprints, polypharmacology, allosteric inhibitors, covalent kinase inhibitors, drug binding mechanism, drug resistance mechanisms, target identification
- MeSH terms
- Ligands, Protein Kinases, Proteome, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Drug Discovery, Polypharmacology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review