Cited by 202Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unleashing the power of generative AI in drug discovery

Open access
Gangwal, Amit, Lavecchia, Antonio·2024·Drug Discovery Today

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing drug discovery by enhancing precision, reducing timelines and costs, and enabling AI-driven computer-aided drug design. This review focuses on recent advancements in deep generative models (DGMs) for de novo drug design, exploring diverse algorithms and their profound impact. It critically analyses the challenges that are intricately interwoven into these technologies, proposing strategies to unlock their full potential. It features case studies of both successes and failures in advancing drugs to clinical trials with AI assistance. Last, it outlines a forward-looking plan for optimizing DGMs in de novo drug design, thereby fostering faster and more cost-effective drug development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drudis.2024.103992

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 147 references

5 of the 147 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Yenduri G et al. Generative pre-trained transformer: a comprehensive review on enabling technologies, potential applications, emerging challenges, and future directions. arXiv 2023: 2305.10435.
  2. Luo Y, Yan K, Ji S. Graphdf: a discrete flow model for molecular graph generation. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. Proc Mach Learn Res 2021;139:7192–203. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v139/luo21a.html.
  3. Hoogeboom E, Satorras VG, Vignac C, Welling M. Equivariant diffusion for molecule generation in 3D. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. Proc Mach Learn Res; 2022: 8867–87.
  4. Kajino H. Molecular hypergraph grammar with its application to molecular optimization. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proc Mach Learn Res 2019;97:3183–91.
  5. Guimaraes GL, Sanchez-Lengeling B, Outeiral C, Farias PLC, Aspuru-Guzik A. Objective-Reinforced Generative Adversarial Networks (ORGAN) for sequence generation models. arXiv 2018;1705.10843. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.10843 · DOI
  6. Jaques N, Gu S, Bahdanau D, Hernández-Lobato JM, Turner RE, Eck D. Sequence tutor: conservative fine-tuning of sequence generation models with kl-control. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. Proc Mach Learn Res 2017;70:1645–54. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/jaques17a
  7. Kadurin, 2017, druGAN: an advanced generative adversarial autoencoder model for de novo generation of new molecules with desired molecular properties in silico, Mol Pharm, 14, 3098, 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00346 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Stanley M et al. Fs-mol: a few-shot learning dataset of molecules. In: Thirty-Fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track (Round 2). https://openreview.net/forum?id=701FtuyLlAd. Published October 11, 2021. Modified May 23, 2023. Accessed January 4, 2024.
  9. Brown, 2019, GuacaMol: benchmarking models for de novo molecular design, J Chem Inf Model, 59, 1096, 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00839 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Polykovskiy, 2020, Molecular Sets (MOSES): a benchmarking platform for molecular generation models, Front Pharmacol, 11, 10.3389/fphar.2020.565644 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Exscientia. Exscientia announces sixth molecule created through generative AI platform to enter clinical stage. https://investors.exscientia.ai/press-releases/press-release-details/2023/Exscientia-Announces-Sixth-Molecule-Created-Through-Generative-AI-Platform-to-Enter-Clinical-Stage/default.aspx. Published May 15, 2023. Accessed January 4, 2024.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 202

Metadata

Authors
Gangwal, A., & Lavecchia, A.
Affiliations
  • Shri Vile Parle Kelavani Mandal (IN)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Lavecchia, Antonio
Venue
Drug Discovery Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
103992
ISSN
1359-6446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4395053803
Cited by
195
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 95 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 23
FWCI
5.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Discovery Today (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Governo Italiano Ministero dell'Istruzione dell'Universita e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
generative AI, drug discovery, deep generative models, de novo drug design, computer-aided drug design, clinical trial candidates
MeSH terms
Drug Development, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Drug Design, Computer-Aided Design, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review