Abuse liability assessment of atomoxetine in a drug-abusing population
Abstract
Background Atomoxetine is a non-amphetamine medication approved to treat ADHD in children, adolescents, and adults. Previous studies demonstrated low abuse potential for atomoxetine in recreational drug users. This study assessed the abuse potential of atomoxetine in stimulant-preferring drug abusers compared to methylphenidate and phentermine as positive controls and desipramine and placebo as negative controls.Methods Forty male and female, 32-53 years old stimulant-preferring drug abusers completed this balanced Latin-square designed study. Subjects received acute, double-blind doses of placebo, desipramine (100 and 200 mg), methylphenidate (90 mg), phentermine (60 mg), and atomoxetine (45, 90, and 180 mg). Subjective and physiological effects were collected for 24 h following each drug treatment.Results Methylphenidate and phentermine were liked significantly more than placebo, atomoxetine, or desipramine. No atomoxetine dose was liked significantly more than placebo and liking scores for atomoxetine were similar to, or significantly lower than, desipramine, as assessed by the Drug Rating Questionnaire-Subject. While atomoxetine 45 and 180 mg did not significantly change any Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) scores, atomoxetine 90 mg significantly increased A and BG stimulant scores of the ARCI and both methylphenidate and phentermine produced greater A and BG increases than any atomoxetine dose and also increased MBG (euphoria) scores relative to placebo.Conclusions Atomoxetine has significantly less abuse liability than methylphenidate or phentermine and no greater abuse liability than desipramine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Atomoxetine may be indicated in patients with comorbid substance use disorders, emotional dysregulation or social anxiety.
“Atomoxetine may be indicated in patients with comorbid substance use disorders, emotional dysregulation or social anxiety [295-297].”
From European consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment of adult ADHD: The European Network Adult ADHD (2010) · cites this paper as [295]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Jasinski, D. R., Faries, D. E., Moore, R. J., Schuh, L. M., & Allen, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, Albert J.
- Venue
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 140-146
- ISSN
- 0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046707923
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- atomoxetine, abuse liability, methylphenidate, phentermine, desipramine, ADHD medication, Addiction Research Center Inventory, euphoria
- MeSH terms
- Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Arousal, Desipramine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Phentermine, Propylamines, Risk, Cross-Over Studies, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review